Lavinia Carmen Uscătescu

@luscatescu.bsky.social

Cognitive neuroscientist; Collegiate Assistant Professor @ Virginia Tech https://support.psyc.vt.edu/users/luscatescu

🚀 Apply to become the new Editor in Chief at Collabra: Psychology, a mission-driven Open Access journal.🚀 Our blog posts describe the responsibilities of this role, the journal, and the application process. Please submit application materials by June 30th, 2026. #PsychSciSky

Collabra: Psychology seeks applications for Editor-in-Chief

Collabra: Psychology, the official journal of the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science, is a mission-driven Open Access (OA) journal from the University of California Press that sha…

buff.ly

We just got approved to hire a teaching professor in Quantitative Methods! This is the *very* rare tenure track teaching position at Berkeley. I'll be chairing the search committee. Official job ad coming later this summer!

As the leading global voice on the environment, UNEP provides leadership and encourages partnership in addressing humanity’s most pressing environmental challenges. To achieve this, we regularly seek qualified professionals to join our team. See current vacancies here: https://ow.ly/Gxon50Y9Qw2

Bild

Thanks, in part, to sustained APS advocacy, #NIH will no longer characterize basic experimental studies involving humans (BESH) as clinical trials. This reduces unnecessary burden and helps psychological and behavioral research move forward faster! www.psychologicalscience.org/policy/2026-...

Success! NIH Changes Clinical Trials Policy

On 29 January 2026, NIH announced that basic experimental studies involving humans will no longer be subject to NIH Clinical Trials Requirements.

psychologicalscience.org

Today I made a small but momentous start to work in 2026 by changing a single number. I renamed the file “Papers to write and submit in 2025” to “Papers to write and submit in 2026”. Stay tuned for more file updates on 1st January 2027.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻 Annual reminder that the book is open access. How do we think of the brain as a deeply interconnected system with highly distributed, non hierarchical processing. Want to learn about the brain from a fresh perspective? #neuroskyence mitpress.mit.edu/978026254460...

The Entangled Brain

Popular neuroscience accounts often focus on specific mind-brain aspects like addiction, cognition, or memory, but The Entangled Brain tackles a much bigger ...

mitpress.mit.edu

This is absolutely wild, and super important. There are zillions of studies claiming that fMRI signals indicate increased brain activity, and it looks like that's often just wrong. If confirmed, this means we've misinterpreted a lot of research.

Magnus Johansson@pgmj.bsky.social · 7mo ago

"40 percent of MRI signals do not correspond to actual brain activity"; "Since tens of thousands of fMRI studies worldwide are based on this assumption, our results could lead to opposite interpretations in many of them.” www.tum.de/en/news-and-...

The entire document is so worthy of reading by a fire or with a cat on lap, or both, pausing frequently to ponder and thought-wander a bit, then continuing on. How I do it, anyways. Solid and compelling arguments crafted with expertise, precision, and measured passion.

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ@olivia.science · 11mo ago

Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia: doi.org/10.5281/zeno... We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity. 1/n

Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues.