Magic Money Tree

@magicmoneytree.bsky.social

Maxing out credit cards and neglecting roofs

"We need to engage more with the right given how much we engage with the left" say Sensibles who have never linked to or promoted anything to the left of the Guardian. They're not exactly filling up my feed with articles from Red Pepper for example (although still plenty from UnHerd)

The main reasons "centrists" want more right wing voices on any platform is so that their own views get less scrutiny and they can default to being the "truth" in the middle. "Centrist": 100ks more people should've died of COVID Their fash friend: Millions. "Centrist": See I'm moderate.

British people love to look at any catastrophe and say "well it didn't impact me directly so any measures to mitigate it must have been unnecessary" just because they couldn't get their treats for a little bit.

Interesting that in the five districts in Greater Manchester where Reform did best (so c.25%-30% on first preferences, and c.40%-45% after second preferences), three of them have high ethnic diversity and two don't. Feels like in some areas a majority of White British people voted Reform or Restore

A table showing for each of the ten districts that make up Greater Manchester the % of the population that's classed as ethnic minority (2021 census), 1st preference voting in Thursday's mayoral election, and final head-to-head Labour vs Reform vote after 2nd preferences taken into account.

The overall results are:
 - Manchester (51.3% ethnic minority): 54.0% 1st preference for Labour, 10.8% for Reform, and 5.3% for Restore (2nd preference 82.5% Labour vs 17.5% Reform)
 - Oldham (34.8% ethnic minority): 41.6% 1st preference for Labour, 29.4% for Reform, 12.0% for Restore (2nd preference 54.7% Labour vs 45.3% Reform)
 - Bolton (31.2% ethnic minority): 40.5% 1st preference for Labour, 25.7% for Reform, 9.9% for Restore (2nd preference 57.5% Labour vs 42.3% Reform)
 - Rochdale (30.0% ethnic minority): 41.5% 1st preference for Labour, 26.2% for Reform, 12.5% for Restore (2nd preference 57.0% Labour vs. 43.0% Reform)
 - Trafford (27.9% ethnic minority): 50.0% 1st preference for Labour, 13.9% for Reform, 5.1% for Restore (2nd preference 74.0% Labour vs 26.0% Reform)
 - Salford (26.0% ethnic minority): 46.8% 1st preference for Labour, 21.0% for Reform, 9.2% for Restore (2nd preference 66.3% Labour vs 33.7% Reform)
 - Bury (21.8% ethnic minority): 46.9% 1st preference for Labour, 22.7% for Reform, 8.9% for Restore (2nd preference 63.1% Labour vs 36.9% Reform)
 - Tameside (17.6% ethnic minority): 41.8% 1st preference for Labour, 27.6% for Reform, 13.5% for Restore (2nd preference 56.4% Labour vs 43.6% Reform)
 - Stockport (16.6% ethnic minority): 50.2% 1st preference for Labour, 17.7% for Reform, 7.0% for Restore (2nd preference 71.2% Labour vs 28.8% Reform)
 - Wigan (8.2% ethnic minority): 47.0% 1st preference for Labour, 30.2% for Reform, 10.1% for Restore (2nd preference 57.3% Labour vs 42.7% Reform)

It's honestly childish how much meat and animal products people feel entitled to consume. When I explain to people why I'm vegan it can be like explaining to an eight-year-old why they probably shouldn't stay up until 11pm playing computer games whilst snorting Dib Dabs

George Monbiot@georgemonbiot.bsky.social · last wk.

It's a point I've been trying to make for a long time: there is no good way to meet even 10% of current demand for animal products. They trash the living world, whichever way you do it. If you want to reduce your impact, switch to a plant-based diet. www.theguardian.com/environment/...

It's a point I've been trying to make for a long time: there is no good way to meet even 10% of current demand for animal products. They trash the living world, whichever way you do it. If you want to reduce your impact, switch to a plant-based diet. www.theguardian.com/environment/...

Organic eggs have worse impact on climate than eggs from caged chickens

Adopting organic free-range model in UK could lead to greenhouse emissions equivalent to 2,316,000 tonnes of CO2, study suggests

theguardian.com

1/🧵 This is particularly bad because it also implicitly discourages recording gender identity and data exchange to maximise outing-in-fact, while presenting it as preventing outing-at-law. This is designed to harm trans people and will lead to excess mortality.

Foxdie@foxdie.bsky.social · last wk.

No it isn't because it makes it mandatory to put "sex observed at birth" on your shared record which will out you, whilst claiming that doing so won't out you as long as they don't also say your gender. Compare previous and current hazard log. This is genuinely very bad.

Not content with locking up over 3,000 people for peacefully protesting against Israel, Labour now wants to do the same to people protesting against their vile attacks on trans people. Labour keeps insisting people have to vote for them to keep fascism out. They ARE the fucking fascists.

Elizabeth Taylor@elizabethtaylor47.bsky.social · last wk.

The fact that this is a coordinated push with Reform is deeply deeply disturbing. This is one of those times for cis liberals with a platform to sit up and listen. This should worry us ALL removepaywalls.com/https://www....

Ministers should consider proscribing a militant transgender activist group which has targeted the offices of MPs, the government's former adviser on political violence has said.
Writing in The Times, Lord Walney said the conduct of the group Bash Back "deserves far more serious attention than it has so far received" and that ministers should test it against the same threshold that led to the proscription of Palestine Action.

I would argue strongly that you *cannot* understand British politics *at all* unless you factor in the huge influence of a very small number of incredibly right wing, incredibly personally abusive dickheads who sit in positions of power within the media and use that to get what they want.

So Andy Burnham's wife is getting endless nasty comments for having a body. I bet the "women's rights movement" that is heavily made up of trans-exclusive columnists who claim to be defending women are right on that. Yeah?

Julie Burchill saying that she can see "that woman's entire ovulation cycle in that frock" and, when corrected about her medical status says "if one wears such a tight dress, showing such detail, one cannot complain of attention  and inspection."