Marlene Ågerstrand

@marleneagerstrand.bsky.social

Assoc Prof, Stockholm University. Science-policy interactions in risk assessment and management of chemicals. https://www.su.se/english/profiles/maag1201-1.191239

This story is about the report that hasn't been published - but it's also about IRIS, the part of EPA that wrote it and has been assessing the toxicity of chemicals for decades. Of 55 scientists who worked on recent IRIS report, only 8 remain in their posts. www.propublica.org/article/epa-...

Scientists Completed a Toxicity Report on This Forever Chemical. The EPA Hasn’t Released It.

Agency scientists found that PFNA could cause developmental, liver and reproductive harms. Their final report was ready in mid-April, according to an internal document reviewed by ProPublica, but the ...

propublica.org

Perceptions matter. Despite an understanding that chemical pollution can affect wildlife behaviour, respondents from industry were more likely to be negative or neutral in their responses to the application of behavioural toxicology to risk assessment compared to those from academia and government.

School of Biological Sciences, Monash @MonashBiol@monashbiol.bsky.social · 11mo ago

What do scientists working in the field of environmental toxicology / behavioural ecology, from industry, government, non-government and academia/research centres think of behavioural endpoints in the protection of human and ecosystem health? doi.org/10.1093/inte... @bbmwong.bsky.social

We have launched a new section on our website showcasing ECHA’s scientific work – progress on alternatives to animal testing, technical updates in chemical safety, upcoming scientific workshops, etc. Have a look! 🔗fcld.ly/sciencenewsbs

Bild

Stockholm University has a fantastic research station on Askö in the Trosa archipelago, and this year we went there for our group retreat. 🌿 Grateful for inspiring conversations, shared laughter, and such friendly colleagues – what a perfect mix of nature, community, and research!

BildBildBildBild

‘Biodiversity is not declining’ is a claim you may have heard. But science says otherwise. 📉 The @ipbes.net #GlobalAssessment reveals 1 million plant & animal species are at risk of extinction. Misinformation clouds the crisis. Rely on trusted research to understand our shared challenges. 🌍🧪

A split-screen image. The left side shows a rhinoceros mother and calf in a savanna landscape with scattered trees. The right side depicts a forest fire scene with orange flames and silhouetted trees against a dark sky.
Text reads:
"Biodiversity is in crisis" followed by:
"1 million plant and animal species risk extinction
Ecosystems are collapsing
Misinformation slows progress." 
"Trust the science.
Conserve, restore and sustainably use biodiversity."

Check out our statement and if you are a PFAS researcher who agrees, you can sign on here: www.ipcp.ch/news/sign-on...

Sign-on campaign: Scientists’ statement on the chemical definition of PFASs | IPCP

ipcp.ch

Cora Young@svocora.bsky.social · last yr.

There have been arguments to redefine #PFAS that seem to be politically or economically motivated. We (20 scientists with PFAS expertise) argue here that the definition of PFAS should be unambiguous and based on chemical structure. pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/...

To recap: There are 10,000+ PFAS. Some are toxic. They're here forever. They pollute water, air, soils, animals and you. Some linked to diseases inc cancers. So when scientists warn against moves to redefine them, we'd better hope people are listening: www.theguardian.com/environment/...

Scientists warn against attempts to change definition of ‘forever chemicals’

Move to narrow classification of Pfas and weaken regulation is ‘politically and/or economically motivated’

theguardian.com