Matt Carrington

@mattcarrington.bsky.social

Book editor, poetry and cultural policy researcher. I edit Holocaust survivor memoirs.

Suggested ground rules for the ‘debate’ on 'bad' cycling 🧵: 1) Cyclists or cycling advocates are not collectively responsible for the bad behaviour of individuals. What’s your actual point? You want less cycling or rules that have that effect? Be clear.

In one of Sarkaria's early op-eds about removing bike lanes he talks about his drive from Brampton to Queen's Park. A stupid drive when there is a GO Train connecting the two. If the train service isn't good enough, you're the minister of transportation. Yet....

How-Sen Chong@how-sen.com · 3w ago

Yesterday Doug Ford did three things that will make congestion around Toronto much, much worse. First, Ford has made made massive cuts to GO Train service on the Lakeshore West, Lakeshore East, Barrie and Stouffville lines. In some cases, GO Train frequency will drop from 15 trains a day to 4 ->

I commute by bike every day, all year in Toronto, and admit to feeling a bit snobby about ebikes—that is, great for other people! However, visiting Montreal last week I tried ebike bixis and it really did feel like magic. I passed people pushing their non-e bixis up hills as I zipped by. Great tech

Jerome Alexander Horne@jahorne.bsky.social · 3w ago

Look, I love an acoustic (analog) bike ride as much as anyone else but E-bikes are magical for traveling around cities. 🚲⚡

Remember when we stumbled on a great solution to traffic congestion in Toronto that maintained or even improved worker productivity, but then the banks and the government decided there was some problem with remote work?

Remember when we stumbled on a great solution to traffic congestion in Toronto that maintained or even improved worker productivity, but then the banks and the government decided there was some problem with remote work?

Hypothetical (fictional) androids can “suffer” now? We have fields of science that acknowledge non-human animal sentience and absolutely no doubt that non-human animals suffer, but instead of looking at that people are excited to extend personhood to computer algorithms. The future!

Zach Weinersmith@zachweinersmith.bsky.social · last mo.

One day C3PO tells you he loves art. He has also looked at a great deal of art, and would suffer greatly due to not being allowed to make art. Is it ethical to forbid him from making art?

These bike lanes are so busy. I have a specific memory of November 28 last year, quite a cold and windy late November Friday evening, dark out, I biked from Yonge/St. Clair to an event in Roncesvalles, taking Bloor much of the way. The bike lanes were absolutely crowded, almost as in this video...

Observing The City@observingthecity.ca · last mo.

Morning commute on a bike lane that Doug Ford wants to rip out. 21 bikes and 4 cars clearing an intersection in 23 seconds. Which mode fights congestion?

I feel like the same people who were against the (proven effective) speed cameras in Toronto are also the people against the bike lanes. The same people who are against getting speeding tickets don't think cyclists should get a lane because bad behaviour. Maybe they care *too much* about road safety

Thread about the Ontario bike lane ruling, based on @edwardrow.com on X When all the evidence shows that more car lanes don't help congestion, and the gov's own reports show that removing bike lanes no won't help congestion, the judge ignored that and goes off his own vibes as "common sense” (1/6)

A Court of Appeal for Ontario
[59] The question, then, is this: is there a rational connection between the purpose of reducing traffic congestion and the decision to increase the number of lanes for motor vehicles by removing
bicycle lanes? The respondents were required to establish that there was no such connection. The appellants were not required to establish that the legislation will prove effective in reducing traffic congestion.
[60]
Common sense provides the answer here: increasing the number of lanes available for motor vehicles must, at least to some extent, and for some period of time, be capable of contributing to reducing traffic congestion. The legislation is therefore rational.
Assumptions grounded in everyday experience and common sense need not be established empirically: Gosselin v. Québec (Attorney General), 2002 SCC 84, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429, at para. 56.
[61] The application judge acknowledged that "increasing the number of lanes available to motor vehicles may allow more cars to travel on a road" and that the respondents' expert "recognized the
possibility of a short-term benefit" from the removal of the bicycle lanes. But instead of accepting that a rational connection had been established and leaving the policy debate about the efficacy of the law to the political process, he went on to consider the expert's predictions of what would happen to motor vehicle traffic "over
David Zipper@davidzipper.bsky.social · last mo.

Ugh. This is a disaster for Toronto. Ripping out protected bike lanes on Bloor Street, Yonge Street, and University Ave will gut the city's bike network. Crashes will increase. And no, traffic will not be faster.

My kid loved learning the recorder last year. She totally learned about musical notes and how to play a simple song, can even play simple versions of a couple pop songs on a recorder. It has her wanting to learn to play piano. Brilliant way to introduce these things to everyone.

ex-Lethality Jane@lethalityjane.bsky.social · last mo.

You played the recorder in part to strengthen your fine motor skills and in part to introduce you to basic music theory concepts like rhythm, the C-major scale, and reading basic music notes. Your teachers wanted to make elementary music education available to all, not just the rich.

Threads post "And then for no reason, no reason at all, they made us all learn how to play the recorder"

14 hours later and my mentions are still full of angry treatises about badly behaved cyclists. Bike lanes are not a reward for good cyclist behavior! They are infrastructure proven to make cities safer for ALL ROAD USERS. Whatever way cyclists have wronged you is irrelevant to the discussion!

Katie Mack@astrokatie.com · last mo.

Every conversation about bike lanes is like: "Car crashes kill a huge number of people every day, including pedestrians, cyclists, & car occupants. Good bike infrastructure has been shown to make everyone safer (& doesn't increase congestion)." "But sometimes cyclists break rules & hit people!"