Thomas A. Carlson

@medievalmiddleeast.bsky.social

Historian of the Middle East c. 950-1500 CE, but I teach much more broadly. I'm writing a book about religious diversity in an illiberal society. https://www.thomasacarlson.com/ https://medievalmideast.org/ https://www.cambridge.org/9781107186279 he/ܗܘ/هو

I stopped using Google Maps in 2025 when it relabeled the Gulf of Mexico at the behest of a certain loudmouth bully. While he probably can give instructions as to what the executive branch calls geographic features, he cannot mandate the names used by anyone else.

The New York Times@nytimes.com · 5d ago

Google Maps has updated to label Lake Ontario as Lake America for users in the U.S., following an executive order signed by President Trump last week amid an escalating trade war with Canada. trib.al/5axpigr

The Toronto skyline at sunset with a body of water visible in front of it. A headline reads: "Google Maps Changes Lake Ontario to Lake America" Photo by Eugen Sakhneko for The New York Times

I always enjoy a good feminist legal history but sometimes I think medieval scholars overrate mere access to institutions as a metric for knowledge and understanding of legal systems, especially when the evidence is women’s access to those institutions was heavily filtered through male intercessors

I should also say two things: 1) I welcome suggestions to improve my teaching! If you have other ideas, or concerns about this approach, please share! 2) I don't know how much of my approach depends on the fact that I teach a widely misrepresented field of history, though I suspect it generalizes.

Thomas A. Carlson@medievalmiddleeast.bsky.social · last wk.

Since I fully agree with the majority view that LLMs/generative "AI" causes brain rot and is bad for teaching humanities, but I disagree with the response "then everything must be handwritten in class," I thought I'd post a thread on my response (which I think preserves accessibility but YMMV): 1+

Since I fully agree with the majority view that LLMs/generative "AI" causes brain rot and is bad for teaching humanities, but I disagree with the response "then everything must be handwritten in class," I thought I'd post a thread on my response (which I think preserves accessibility but YMMV): 1+

We have written a statement in support of Ghent Uni's decision to suspend Nathan Cofnas. We resist attempts to frame this as a punishment for "whistleblowing" or censorship of "controversial research". We invite all academics who share our views to sign our letter. forms.gle/qwN8xzEM5C7Q...

Open letter on the suspension of Nathan Cofnas at Ghent University

We, colleagues of Nathan Cofnas - supported by many colleagues internationally - want to respond to the negative and incorrect framing of Ghent University’s decision to suspend Nathan Cofnas. With th...

forms.gle

A notice to scientists doing paleosciences: please #TalkToALibrarian about the bibliographic traditions in History. Science databases are virtually worthless for finding scholarship in history. You cannot cite a book review you found in a science journal in lieu of actually reading the history BOOK.

I am very tired of academics and feel compelled to spend the day looking at cool manuscripts. The undertext here is John 14–15 in Christian Palestinian Aramaic (~700 CE), a dialect similar to Jewish Palestinian Aramaic written in a script resembling Syriac. The overtext is Hebrew poetry copied ~900.

Brownish parchment manuscript folio with several sections torn from the edges, sitting on a blue background. There are about 30 lines of Hebrew text in black ink, which appear upside-down from this perspective. Behind the Hebrew is about 20 lines of light-brown, much-faded Christian Palestinian Aramaic text in 2 columns. The classmark is CUL T-S 16.98 (additional images here: https://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/MS-TS-00016-00098/1)Multispectral image photograph of the same manuscript from the previous image. The Hebrew text now appears bright teal, clearly distinct from the Aramaic text behind it, which is now dark purple. The background looks grey.

These two pages are the Hebrew book of Numbers written in Arabic script (~11th century). You read that right: it's Hebrew language transliterated using the Arabic alphabet for Arabic-speaking Jews. Manuscripts like this have proven vital to reconstructing medieval Hebrew pronunciation traditions.

Light brown paper bifolium with 9 lines of messy brown-black Arabic script pointed with a combination of Arabic consonantal diacritic dots and Hebrew vowel dots. The manuscript sits on a blue background next to a yellow label that reads T-S Ar.52.242 P1 (images and metadata here: https://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/MS-TS-AR-00052-00242/1)

I almost want to produce an edited volume, "The Life of a History Professor," where professors who don't teach at fancy schools talk about what it's really like trying to be a history professor. It might be eye-opening for many constituencies.

I can put seven words on a cardboard sign and stand beside a busy intersection in my small city for one hour and have ~2,000 drivers read those words, and I'm afraid academia is not successfully persuading me that any writing I have done is any more impactful than putting words on a sign.

It’s been a couple of years of tech bros and influencers telling us ‘AI is progressing so fast, your [insert sector] is SO cooked’ and honestly the only thing worrying about it so far is how easily managers in all walks of work have been duped by this slop.

Post nicht verfügbar.

In case you are an academic who is currently being gaslit into believing that you're a caveman who wants their students to be jobless if you resist allowing AI in your classrooms... I present to you Berkeley Law's response, which can be summarized as "Fuck off directly into the sun."

Artificial Intelligence Policy

Effective Summer 2026 Purpose Future lawyers may need to use artificial intelligence (“AI”) fluently. But the current state of the technology requires that AI use be coupled with the cognitive […]

law.berkeley.edu

So we know AI helped a negligible number of students. But how many did it harm? I've crunched the raw data provided by the lead researcher, and what I've found is that ~9,500 students using AI studied less than even the *least* studious, non-AI using student. This should shock the conscience.

Bild
Benjamin Riley@benjaminjriley.bsky.social · 2w ago

Both the Economist and others suggest this study demonstrates that AI can help students. So I contacted the lead researcher to figure out how many. Answer: Out of ~26,000 kids, a total of 20. And five months after starting to use AI, only four continued to spend 65 minutes on homework. Four.

Some visually striking excerpts from a 15th century Karaite Judeo-Arabic (and that one little block of Arabic script text!) majmū'a of medical and scientific texts (SBB Ms. or. oct. 349), a reminder that I really ought to refresh my knowledge of Hebrew script:

BildBildBild

After my time adjucting I can’t pass up a chance to remind you this is the actual crisis in higher education. “I recently heard about a student who was shocked to discover, upon dropping food off at a local pantry, that their instructor was the one picking it up.”

The Nation Magazine@thenation.com · 3w ago

There are jobs for college instructors. They do require degrees. But the pay and the benefits are abysmal. Another take on the state of the academy: