Meryl Ye

@merylye.bsky.social

Societal Computing PhD Student @ CMU | Cornell CS alum | merylye.github.io

🚨 New preprint 🚨 We developed a sycophancy taxonomy based on prior literature and surveyed 106 experts. 94% agreed it's a serious problem. But they substantially disagreed about which behaviors actually count as sycophancy.

Bild

Studying AI sycophancy? We’re running a 10-min expert survey on how researchers define & evaluate it. If you’ve authored ≥1 paper on sycophancy or related areas (alignment, personalization, preference learning), you’re eligible to participate. Sign up here: forms.gle/dY5L79cAxb95...

AI Sycophancy Expert Survey Sign-Up

We’re conducting a 10-minute expert survey to better understand how researchers define and evaluate AI sycophancy. If you’re interested in participating, please sign up using this form. We’ll email yo...

forms.gle

🚨 New preprint 🚨 Across 3 experiments (n = 3,285), we found that interacting with sycophantic (or overly agreeable) AI chatbots entrenched attitudes and led to inflated self-perceptions. Yet, people preferred sycophantic chatbots and viewed them as unbiased! osf.io/preprints/ps... Thread 🧵

Abstract and results summary

I would love to never see the phrase "little is known about" in a paper ever again. (1) Most of the time the authors are far more confident about that statement than they should be. (2) There are lots of things we know little about because no one cares. Just not knowing isn't a good motivation.

This is one of the worst violations of research ethics I've ever seen. Manipulating people in online communities using deception, without consent, is not "low risk" and, as evidenced by the discourse in this Reddit post, resulted in harm. Great thread from Sarah, and I have additional thoughts. 🧵

Sarah Gilbert@sarahagilbert.bsky.social · last yr.

The mods of r/ChangeMyView shared the sub was the subject of a study to test the persuasiveness of LLMs & that they didn't consent. There’s a lot that went wrong, so here’s a 🧵 unpacking it, along with some ideas for how to do research with online communities ethically. tinyurl.com/59tpt988

Found an old notepad from elementary school. Not exactly sure what I was up to…but it seems like I’ve had a longstanding interest in social media users? Hopefully now I know better than to use USA Today as a reference.

Bild

🚨In Nature🚨 Meta is dropping fact-checking to avoid anti-conservative bias- but is there actually evidence of bias? We this test empirically & find that conservatives * ARE suspended more * BUT share more misinfo So suspension isn't necessarily evidence of bias www.nature.com/articles/s41...

Differences in misinformation sharing can lead to politically asymmetric sanctions - Nature

We find that conservatives tend to share more low-quality news through social media than liberals, and so even if technology companies enact politically neutral anti-misinformation policies, political...

nature.com

I am making a Societal Computing starter pack for folks that (broadly) look at the impact of computer science on society. So far, mostly people affiliated with the eponymous program in the school of computer science at CMU, but pls respond to this thread if you want to be added. go.bsky.app/2avpExM

Post nicht verfügbar.