Katrina Rose Quinn

@mightyrosequinn.bsky.social

Neuroscientist in Tübingen & mother of dragons. Interested in visual perception, decision-making & expectations.

🚨 🆕 Preprint 🚨 How does the brain represent natural images? Using MEG + multivariate analysis, we disentangle contributions of retinotopy, spatial frequency, shape, and texture Together, our results reveal how visual features jointly and dynamically support human object recognition. link 👇

Bild

Really enjoyed my weekend read on 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠: local recurrence amplifies natural input patterns and suppresses stray activity. This review beautifully argues that sensory cortex itself is a site of memory and prediction. Food for thought on hallucinations! #neuroskyence #neuroscience

Mark Histed@markhisted.org · 10mo ago

The brain is incredibly densely connected. Human cerebral cortex may have as many as *one trillion* connections. Most of those cortical connections are recurrent, inside each area. What do they do? New paper from me in Annual Reviews: 🧪 🧠📈 1/ www.annualreviews.org/content/jour...

📢 Deadline extended! 📢 The registration deadline for #SNS2025 has been extended to Sunday, September 28th! Register here 👉 meg.medizin.uni-tuebingen.de/sns_2025/reg... PS: Students of the GTC (Graduate Training Center for Neuroscience) in Tübingen can earn 1 CP for presenting a poster! 👀

a woman in front of a white board with the words take your time written on it

ALT: a woman in front of a white board with the words take your time written on it

media.tenor.com

Not long to go now! For those of you who enjoy a more intimate conference with a chance to get to know your favourite speakers I would highly recommend this right here. Reach out if you have any questions :)

Tübingen SNS 2025@snstuebingen.bsky.social · 11mo ago

🔵Tübingen SNS 2025🔵 Registration is still open for the #SNS2025 event on 6-7 October! Join us for plenary lectures 🗣️, poster sessions📊and social events 👥 about system neuroscience!🧠 Registration at meg.medizin.uni-tuebingen.de/sns_2025

🚨🚨🚨PREPRINT ALERT🚨🚨🚨 Neural dynamics across cortical layers are key to brain computations - but non-invasively, we’ve been limited to rough "deep vs. superficial" distinctions. What if we told you that it is possible to achieve full (TRUE!) laminar (I, II, III, IV, V, VI) precision with MEG!

Overview of the simulation strategy and analysis. a) Pial and white matter boundaries
surfaces are extracted from anatomical MRI volumes. b) Intermediate equidistant surfaces are
generated between the pial and white matter surfaces (labeled as superficial (S) and deep (D)
respectively). c) Surfaces are downsampled together, maintaining vertex correspondence across
layers. Dipole orientations are constrained using vectors linking corresponding vertices (link vectors).
d) The thickness of cortical laminae varies across the cortical depth (70–72), which is evenly sampled
by the equidistant source surface layers. e) Each colored line represents the model evidence (relative
to the worst model, ΔF) over source layer models, for a signal simulated at a particular layer (the
simulated layer is indicated by the line color). The source layer model with the maximal ΔF is
indicated by “˄”. f) Result matrix summarizing ΔF across simulated source locations, with peak
relative model evidence marked with “˄”. g) Error is calculated from the result matrix as the absolute
distance in mm or layers from the simulated source (*) to the peak ΔF (˄). h) Bias is calculated as the
relative position of a peak ΔF(˄) to a simulated source (*) in layers or mm.