Tessera
Folgen

Molly A. Delooze

@mollyadelooze.bsky.social

Doctor in Psychology from Cardiff University. Research interests include experimental design, working memory and attention. Open Science advocate.

6 Posts55 Follower52 Folgt
Genevieve Lawson@genevievelawson.bsky.social · 8mo ago

Spent the last few days in Tübingen Germany at #TeaP2026 where I presented some data from one of my PhD thesis chapters about Proactive Cognitive Control use by children in a working memory task. Thoroughly enjoyed my time in Germany meeting old and new friends.

Title slide from powerpoint presentation. The title: “Do children use proactive cognitive control strategies consistently when remembering? Insights from eye movements” is presented in a light pink oval.Photo of colour houses along a river bank in Tübingen Germany on a cloudy day
Candice Morey@candicemorey.bsky.social · last yr.

Cognitive scientists, here is your chance to help @davidecrepaldi.bsky.social and ESCoP continue to build our field's leading open-access journal, @jcgntn.bsky.social. Take a look and get involved!

Davide Crepaldi@davidecrepaldi.bsky.social · last yr.

Hey world, next January I’ll take the torch from the fantastic @candicemorey.bsky.social as Editor of @jcgntn.bsky.social. I’m thrilled! But most importantly, I’m looking for Associate Editors 😜, so take a look here: www.escop.eu/about-us/jou.... Come work with us, or nominate colleagues you love!

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ@olivia.science · last yr.

"We are told that AI is inevitable, that we must adapt or be left behind. But universities are not tech companies. Our role is to foster critical thinking, not to follow industry trends uncritically." www.ru.nl/en/research/...

‘Opposing the inevitability of AI at universities is possible and necessary’ | Radboud University

Since the widespread release of ChatGPT in December of 2022, AI has taken over much of the world by storm – including academia. Most of this happened with very little pushback, despite a myriad of iss...

ru.nl

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ@olivia.science · last yr.

Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia: doi.org/10.5281/zeno... We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity. 1/n

Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece, we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to relevant work to further inform our colleagues.