Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics

@mpi-nl.bsky.social

We undertake fundamental research into the psychological, social and biological foundations of #language | Onderzoeksinstituut voor #taal, van genetica tot gedrag

Visuospatial experience shapes the form of gestures: Blind speakers gesture with more precise spatial tracking of motion than sighted speakers. New paper by @ezgimamus.bsky.social , Mounika Kanakanti, @shoakamine.bsky.social, @asliozyurek.bsky.social. doi.org/10.3758/s134....

Visuospatial experience shapes the form of gestures: Blind speakers gesture with more precise spatial tracking of motion than sighted speakers - Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Co-speech gestures emerge from the interaction between visuospatial experience and speech formulation, but what happens when visual experience is absent from birth? Blind individuals gesture in ways consistent with their native language, albeit they gesture less frequently. However, nothing is known about whether their gesture form differs from that of sighted individuals. Using computer vision technologies, this study examines whether gesture kinematics are shaped by visuospatial experience. In an auditory motion-description task, we analyzed spontaneous path-only gestures – depicting motion trajectories – produced by 20 congenitally blind, 21 blindfolded, and 21 sighted Turkish speakers. We assessed the gestures’ alignment with actual motion paths, along with duration and size. Blind participants produced gestures that were more precisely aligned with the motion trajectories, as well as larger and longer. These findings show that altered spatial cognition in blindness enhances gesture precision. The study underscores the role of sensorimotor experience in shaping gesture form.

doi.org

The properties of personal semantics. New paper by Annick Tanguay & al. With @shariceclough.bsky.social doi.org/10.3758/s13421-026-01895-1 Paper: tinyurl.com/yb9fyj8p

The properties of personal semantics - Memory & Cognition

Recent cognitive neuroscience research has uncovered some similarities and some differences between general semantic memory (GS; e.g., knowledge about family in general) and personal semantic memory (PS; e.g., knowledge about my family in particular). To better understand the representational content and cognitive processes of PS and their relation to general semantics, we adapted a staple of General semantic memory research, the Property Generation task. In a first study, we randomly assigned 240 adult participants to a traditional General semantics perspective (e.g., listing the properties of families and bedrooms in general) or to a PS perspective (e.g., my family, my bedroom) in a between-subjects design. In a second, replication study, 124 participants completed the task in a within-subject design, taking each perspective for different concepts. Relative to the General semantics condition, the PS condition was associated with more features; these were more semantically distant from each other, and included adjectives more frequently and nouns less frequently. However, the two conditions had substantial (~46%) overlap in the frequency of their features. The findings contribute to the identification of the cognitive differences (e.g., semantic richness) and similarities (e.g., correspondence in semantic features) between personal and general semantic memory.

doi.org