Muhammed Bulutay

@mvbulutay.bsky.social

Postdoc at Heidelberg University. I am a behavioral economist who works on topics related to information and expectations, using experimental methods. https://www.muhammedbulutay.com/

Thanks to everybody who chimed in! I arrived at the conclusion that (1) there's a lot of interesting stuff about interactions and (2) the figure I was looking for does not exist. So, I made it myself! Here's a simple illustration of how to control for confounding in interactions:>

Bild
Julia M. Rohrer@dingdingpeng.the100.ci · last yr.

Does anybody have a good visualization to explain how interactions can be confounded, and why interactions require interaction controls? @urisohn.bsky.social maybe? (Asking because I have an idea, but want to check out what exists already before investing the effort)

The "unexpected compression" in wages continues! Non-managerial wages (for around 80% of private workforce) continues to grow somewhat stronger than overall wages. This means the reduction in wage inequality post-pandemic has remained, and continued (at a slower pace).

Bild

Whenever I post about climate, skeptical folks inevitable respond with this graph. So I decided to do something radical: actually read the underling scientific paper and ask the authors. As it turns out, it actually says the opposite of what skeptics claim: www.theclimatebrink....

Bild

After a long wait, the working paper for the Many-Economists Project: The Sources of Researcher Variation in Economics. We had 146 teams perform the same research three times, each time with less freedom. What source of freedom leads to different choices and results? papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

The Sources of Researcher Variation in Economics

We use a rigorous three-stage many-analysts design to assess how different researcher decisions—specifically data cleaning, research design, and the interpretat

papers.ssrn.com

This is a very interesting result. My opinion: RCTs remain one of the more robust methods for p-hacking because the results are more verifiable due to data availability, pre-registration, and simplicity of analyses. In contrast, IV, structural, and simulations are much more flexible for p-hacking.

Prashant Garg@prashantgarg.bsky.social · 2y ago

There is large variation by Methods. RCTs and RDDs have relatively high null results across all fields. Typically, with RCTs it is harder to do specification mining to get your desired large result. Sadly, the scandal shows there may be other research malpractice that can get you there.

After being alerted about possible misconduct, the I4R are reproducing published papers that use data from a specific NGO (GDRI). This thread releases the first 2 reports and provides more information about the work and responses/statements from authors journals and journals. 🧵

BildBild

A central banker talking about growth? Looks like it's going to be an interesting talk. I wish my German was good enough to keep up.

Berlin School of Economics@bsoeberlin.bsky.social · 2y ago

📯Leading monetary policy expert speaks at the @humboldtuni.bsky.social 🔖 On March 10, 2025, Dr. Joachim Nagel, President @bundesbank.de on "Economic Policy Measures to Boost Growth in Germany" (in German) ➡️ 583993de96e211efb2e583f07a586736.eo.page/dr-joachim-n... #register #economicpolicy