Dr Eddie Ungless

@mxeddie.bsky.social

academic transfag interested in harms of language technologies | he/they | see also mxeddie.github.io [Image description: Profile picture shows cartoon of Eddie's face looking very displeased. He is white with blue eyes, a dark moustache and brown hair]

My post-doc at Uni of Surrey with Prof Sastry has come to an end, so I'm looking for work 👀 Seeking interdisciplinary projects looking at the harms of AI to marginalised people. I have a strong publication record and v. broad range of skills. Ideally hybrid/ remote positions in UK. Please share 🩷

A "selfie" photograph of Eddie Ungless, a white transmasc researcher, wearing a pink suit. They are smiling at the camera. He has a brown mullet, brown moustache, and several facial piercings. There are two pieces of overlaid text. These read "Open to work" and "Interdisciplinary researcher with expertise on the harms of AI"

Seeking stats advice! I have a dataset of replies, from a large number of users, to a small number of recipients, men and women. I want to work out of the rates of a particularly type of reply are higher for women than men. Thinking mixed effects logistic model, but unsure how to handle recipients.

@chi.acm.org hello, I was wondering if you could confirm if there was a page limit for poster final submissions, I couldn't find this info online (and the switch from 1 to 2 columns makes the original submission page limit no longer applicable).

Playing around with generating anti-feminist synthetic data,* and delighted by the following: "Menfolk who play impish ladders in court should be made to fight for their gender identity so we don't get into more troubles!" *I know, I know, synthetic data is poor quality, I'm exploring my options

Do any of you still have an X account? If so would you mind spending a couple of minutes requesting your data archive (in settings & privacy / your account )... If you too end up in an endless loop I would appreciate you letting me know!

I have been on ADHD medication for about a year and it still DELIGHTS and BAFFLES me that I can listen to music with lyrics whilst I work now because I can just choose (?) to focus (?) on what I'm reading (???!)

Any of you familiar with US law sufficiently to say if the chat history of an "AI" used by a therapist e.g. to summarise notes would be considered privileged? I'm inclined to assume it would be, along with the notes. But sharing info with a third party voids privilege afaik. So which one is it?

Any of y'all know enough about GDPR to tell me whether a therapist copying session notes into an LLM where the conversation is being recorded by a third party (and the therapist knows this) violates GPDR? (thankfully not an example from my life, but inspired by many interactions in Wildchat)