The making of this week's #TidyTuesday chart recorded with {camcorder} in #RStats 📹

An international team of researchers has proposed an overall definition of questionable research practices (QRPs) and published a comprehensive list of them—as well as ways to detect and prevent them. @nagyt.bsky.social @amathia-deluxe.bsky.social‬ #Psychology

International Team Constructs Definition, Inventory of Questionable Research Practices

An international team of researchers has proposed an overall definition of QRPs and published a comprehensive list of them—as well as ways to detect and prevent them.

psychologicalscience.org

The structure of a good software test - the latest in my Better Code, Better Science series. russpoldrack.substack.com/p/the-struct...

The structure of a good software test

Better Code, Better Science: Chapter 4, Part 2

russpoldrack.substack.com

🚨New paper out in AMPPS! proud to be part of this one, another solid product of @improvingpsych.org✨ We mapped the grey zones of psychology’s research culture through a consensus process. Ever wondered, “Wait... is this a questionable practice?” You’re not alone: doi.org/10.1177/2515... #OpenScience

Tamás Nagy@nagyt.bsky.social · last yr.

🚨 New study alert! We're excited to share our "Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology" in #AMPPS. We tackle the credibility crisis in research by defining, collecting, and categorizing QRPs using a community consensus method. 🧵#OpenScience #QRPs @psychscience.bsky.social

🚨 New study alert! We're excited to share our "Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology" in #AMPPS. We tackle the credibility crisis in research by defining, collecting, and categorizing QRPs using a community consensus method. 🧵#OpenScience #QRPs @psychscience.bsky.social

🚨 New study alert! We're excited to share our "Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology" in #AMPPS. We tackle the credibility crisis in research by defining, collecting, and categorizing QRPs using a community consensus method. 🧵#OpenScience #QRPs @psychscience.bsky.social

Very excited to publicly share news about a new tool, Papercheck, that @debruine.bsky.social and me started to develop more than a year ago! In an introductory blog post, we explain our philosophy to automatically check scientific papers for best practices. daniellakens.blogspot.com/2025/06/intr...

Join us for the exciting hackathons during #SIPS2025 in Budapest on June 25-27! Hackatron participants will work on projects related to diversity and inequity in academia, career guides for psychology, secondary data analysis, the quality of psychological tests, new publishing initiatives, & more!

📣 Big news: Lifecycle Journal is now open for submissions! 📣 Lifecycle Journal is a new, innovative, community-driven approach to scholarly publishing, initiated by COS. Learn more and submit: lifecyclejournal.org/

a valuble checklist for cross-cultural studies: “The Test Adaptation Reporting Standards (TARES): reporting test adaptations” www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

People are often surprised to learn they can design a study where you look at the data twice (a sequential design) at no cost (because the alpha correction is so small, there is no increase in the sample size). To learn how, see lakens.github.io/statistical_...

DATA COLLECTED BY STUDENTS: Do you use it for your own research? Concerned about its quality? 🤔 Our new paper explores questionable practices and research misconduct (QRP/M) during data collection in student projects: spb.psychopen.eu/index.php/sp... 🧵1/6