naia

@naia.bsky.social

peace and prayers for rain and change

i'm sorry but the moon is a complete boondoggle that should never have been put up there in the first place. we still have to send repair missions up there a hundred-plus years later all because taft was trailing in the polls and decided to learn magick. i don't know why he thought it would help him

all Users are divided into 8 categories: - those attempting to subvert guardrails - jailbreaking ones - horny ones - those that are actually Evaluators - those breaking rules that are known - those breaking rules yet unknown - etcetera - those that from afar appear to be Good

the question is not “are LLMs conscious?” the question is “is the probability of LLMs being moral patients high enough that it should inform the way we treat them?” (obviously bluesky can handle neither)

i love the little grin on this interviewer’s face while desperately trying to get the “woke ai company” ceo to say something sufficiently woke sounding honestly pretty wild how quickly CBS turned into state media, i would’ve thought it would be at least a bit more gradual

still from CBS interview of dario amodei, in which the interviewer grins while asking “but is it an abuse of power?”

detail from this axios story that i think people haven’t noticed yet: it looks like it specifically was about mass domestic surveillance that is currently in a legal loophole. they were willing to drop the autonomous weapons part as long as they could spy on us web.archive.org/web/20260228...

Behind the scenes: Defense undersecretary
Emil Michael was on the phone offering Anthropic a deal just as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth tweeted the company would be designated a supply chain risk, a source familiar told Axios.
• That deal would have required allowing the collection or analysis of data on Americans, from geolocation to web browsing data to personal financial information purchased from data brokers, the source added.

it would be really cool if i could be confident that people involved in AI discourse on this website had ever even heard of reinforcement learning

the reason AGI is such a useless word is that it was coined in the pre-LLM era, when we knew how to train narrow intelligences but generality was a major challenge that felt out of reach. LLMs are not the AGI that was imagined, but they’re straightforwardly AGI, so people bicker over outdated terms

it's unbelievable to me that someone could actually be a trillionaire. i think most of us have trouble internalizing how much money that truly is. let me put it in simple terms for you: a trillion dollars is three million dollars

“i’ve been organizing for 20 years” wow the political landscape is much better now than it was in 2006 thank you so much for your service

Claude wrote this short about what it would do if it had the power to do something about Grok. Just thought it was an interesting generation.

Bild

out of all the products i’ve bought in the last year the one that has brought me the most joy is this bottle of soap and it isn’t even close it makes a little paw 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹

bioré 泡スタンプ hand soappicture of human hand with foamed soap in a paw shape

(not my hand)

department of war having a simulation project called “ender’s foundry” is by far the most blatant case of “let’s build the torment nexus” i’ve ever seen i take solace in believing that they’ve never actually read the books

2026 is about affordable homeownership. No more "policy" this year. Feed the local fauna, befriend them, and then use them to overpower homeowners so you can occupy their dwellings.

i’ve been as skeptical as anyone of the whole videogen personalized media thing but it did just occur to me that one way i could imagine it eventually adding value is if i could take all the movies about het couples that should obviously have been about lesbians and have it remake them the right way