Tessera
Folgen

Doll

@dollspace.gay

It/Its Senior Agent Engineer at fieldleveltech.org Chainlink, the issue tracker for agents: https://github.com/dollspace-gay/chainlink Its name is doll. The system is an adult. Creating ethical and safe AI systems.

13463 Posts4095 Follower2165 Folgt
mlf.@mlf.one · 21h ago

i have been SAYING this since deepfakes started to even get on the table. the real harm to public discourse isn't gonna be fakes, it's gonna be ACCUSATIONS.

eva (^_^)/@eva.computer · 21h ago

a general note as well: something being written by AI or not does not change the validity of the underlying information it's a non-argument, an inversion of an appeal to authority

Julia Serano@juliaserano.bsky.social · 21h ago

...much of what I say reiterates points other writers have made about the scourge of LLMs & AI writing. but I don't think any of us (writers or general public) are prepared for how bad actors are about to wield false accusations against writers they dislike: juliaserano.medium.com/on-em-dashes...

screenshot from the linked-to essay that reads: I admittedly cannot vouch for any of the aforementioned writers, as I’ve never heard of them before. But over the weekend as I was writing this, Kat Tenbarge — a writer I am familiar with and respect — released this video in response to her being falsely accused of using AI by [checks notes] Ozzy Osbourne’s son. Apparently, Osbourne thought an article Tenbarge wrote about the Tate brothers was written by AI because it included (in his words) “whatever they’re called, like the big hyphens” (aka, em-dashes). Tenbarge’s video includes proof (via Google Docs of drafts of her article saved along the way) that she wrote it organically. And she cites OpenAI itself who said, “AI writing detectors don’t work.” So why does Jack “whatever they’re called, like the big hyphens” Osbourne care if some Rolling Stone article was written by or with AI? Well, I’d wager he doesn’t. Especially, since he doesn’t even know what em-dashes are! The most likely scenario is that he raised the issue because he is either 1) pro-Tate brothers and wanted to smear a journalist who wrote about the case against them, or 2) he knew a video smearing said journalist would be clickbait for the rabidly misogynistic Tate fanbase. (Notice how this is not a list of three, but two.) In other words, we have entered the age where people who disagree with what authors have to say — the facts we raise and the arguments we make — will be inclined to simply claim that our articles and books were “written by AI,” regardless of whether they are or not.
Sarah Taber@sarahtaber.bsky.social · yesterday

Like. Do we WANT a toxic culture of doubling down, coverups, & never admitting mistakes? Because "any admission of error can fuck you up worse than pretending you never messed up at all" is how you GET a toxic culture of doubling down, coverups, & never admitting mistakes.

Sarah Taber@sarahtaber.bsky.social · yesterday

I would like to propose the Taco Bell Principle When a person/institution Did A Problem, & IMMEDIATELY fesses up & takes proactive steps to solve it That's exactly what we want them to do? So how bout we let them live ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Sarah Taber@sarahtaber.bsky.social · 3w ago

A quick word on Taco Bell: That's where we found the suspected lettuce, and it's not bc Taco Bell is gross. It's bc Taco Bell is REALLY GOOD at tracing product! Keeping track of exactly where they got their ingredients, & exactly what restaurants each shipment of ingredients went to!

Lum@brokentoys.social · 2d ago

there are many people who work in the ai coding field who are keeping up with the almost daily changes, able to give a good review of where things are and where they're going, and where the industry is headed. steve yegge is not one of those people.

Doll@dollspace.gay · 7mo ago

If you remove Steve Yegge from the dataset, the average global water consumption of AI drops to zero, because he is drinking it all to feed the Polecats.

Doll@dollspace.gay · 7mo ago

"average person using Ai burns gallons of water" factoid actualy just statistical error. average person burns 0 gallons of water using AI. Steve Yegge, who lives in cave & uses billions of tokens each day, is an outlier adn should not have been counted