Nathan Heller

@nathanheller.bsky.social

New Yorker staff writer, hapless itinerant, reader. My concise and infrequent newsletter announces significant new publications, public appearances, and nothing else: nathanheller.substack.com/about

Mark loved to be self-effacing, but he was one of the greats—an assiduous reporter and a writer who was funny and free. So many of us at the magazine grew up reading him, and kept looking to him for a sense of how it could be done. A huge loss.

Michael Schulman@michaelschulman.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Another sad loss today: the longtime New Yorker writer Mark Singer. Here's his marvelous profile of Ricky Jay, from 1993. www.newyorker.com/magazine/199...

I count my lucky stars I got to visit the huge, delicious retrospective last summer—probably the most remarkable single-artist exhibition I've seen, and a moving case for Hockney as one of the real giants, alive with restlessness and daring and uncertainty and, above all, creative generosity. R.I.P.

Los Angeles Times@latimes.com · 2mo ago

David Hockney, the innovative and prolific British artist who arrived in Los Angeles in 1964, soon celebrating its sun-drenched life and landscapes in colorful, wildly popular paintings, died Thursday. He was 88. www.latimes.com/obituaries/s...

Photo of David Hockney sitting and leaning his chin on a cane. Text reads Los Angeles Times Obituary David Hockney 1937-2026

Raise a glass. This was, as far as I know, the first culture-discussion podcast—eighteen years!—and the template on which all the others were based. When I was a junior staffer at Slate, so many moons ago, having one's work discussed on the Gabfest was the greatest thrill. Probably still.

Carl Wilson@carlzoilus.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Very sadly, it's been announced today that the @slate.com Culture Gabfest, which set the standard for arts podcasts, will end after this month. I had the honour of being one of the first regular guests to come say goodbye, with a final great conversation. carlwilson.substack.com/p/au-revoir-...

Agree. "Content" makes it easier to talk as if people are responding to business and distribution models rather than to work. No one—no one!—decides to spend hours with "content." They're either taken up with the piece in front of them, in the specific reasons it's irresistible, or they're not.

Josh Gondelman@joshgondelman.bsky.social · 2mo ago

My crankiest old man take is that referring to all art/entertainment/journalism/criticism/comedy/advertising as “content” helped pave the way for broad-ish acceptance of AI slop.

I spent some time with George Lucas and Mellody Hobson; here's the first look at the huge and unusual museum they are opening in Los Angeles this fall, after about a billion dollars of their own money and years of lost access to their dining-room table. www.vogue.com/article/luca...

Inside the Otherworldly Lucas Museum of Narrative Art in Los Angeles

George Lucas and Mellody Hobson on the massive new architectural icon—housing their personal collection of art and artifacts—opening in September 2026

vogue.com

My view here is: let's go. If someone's writing truly is indistinguishable from what an A.I. grinds out, by all means, step aside. It just demarcates more clearly the realm of writing that A.I. can't do—what's original, human, singular, and interesting—and makes its special value clearer.

Sarah Weinman@sarahweinman.com · 6mo ago

“If I can generate a book in a day, and you need six months to write a book, who’s going to win the race?” God this is bleak

Yes. Every time you disrupt, revolve, start from scratch, etc., you give yourself a fresh slate of problems and knock-on effects to notice, track, guard against, and solve. Most institutions highly imperfect, but have that behind them. They let you pick up the thread of improvement at a later point.

Alexis Madrigal@alexis-madrigal.bsky.social · 6mo ago

The longer I've gone in journalism, the more I think I underestimated how important the institutional knowledge inside newspapers really was. Newspaper reporters and editors *knew the place* and their combined knowledge is irreplaceable.

When Gavin Newsom first entered public office, at the age of 28, there was a feeling that he would flourish without ascending to the top—too slick, too swank, too smug. Three decades later, the criticisms are the same, but his prospects have transformed. newyorkermag.visitlink.me/KV6N0q

Gavin Newsom Is Playing the Long Game

California’s governor has been touted as the Democrats’ best shot in 2028. But first he’ll need to convince voters that he’s not just a slick establishment politician.

newyorkermag.visitlink.me

The US immigrant population generated more in taxes than they received in benefits from all levels of government every year from 1994 to 2023. The Cato study provides the first-ever 30-year analysis of the fiscal effects of immigration on government budgets. https://ow.ly/jy8a50Y8kM3

Bild