Nora Müller (she/her)

@nrmllr.bsky.social

Sociologist. Senior researcher at GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim. Research interests: social inequality, wealth inequality, family sociology, contraceptive behavior. Website: nrmllr.github.io/

Louis Henderson and Jane Humphries argue in the OxREP that care labour is systematically neglected in conventional economic metrics. They illustrate how breastfeeding has been historically unrecognised despite its crucial contribution to infant health. doi.org/10.1093/oxre...

The economic history of caring labour: a case study of breastfeeding

Abstract. Caring labour, whether paid or unpaid, creates value, supports economic activity, and generates positive externalities, yet suffers neglect in co

doi.org

Happy to share my new study, publ. in Social Science Research 🎉 Bottom line: Yes, adolescents use their phones a lot 🤳 But I find no support for the notion that this use displaces reading, homework, hobbies, physical act., sleep... Instead: Changing media preferences 📺 ->📱. doi.org/10.1016/j.ss...

Redirecting

doi.org

Sebastian E. Wenz@sewenz.bsky.social · last yr.

From the abstract: "[...] no evidence that early adolescents spend less time on enrichment, physical activity, or sleep after acquiring their first mobile phone. Instead, acquiring their first mobile phone is associated with a significant reduction in time spent watching TV, movies, or videos."

Introducing ISI, the new Munich International Stone Center for Inequality Research: www.lmu.de/isi (for a German news announcement: www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/lmu...) We will support & push forward the study of socioeconomic inequality (esp. wealth inequality) across disciplines & countries. /1

Munich International Stone Center for Inequality Research

ISI is a research center for the study of social inequality. It connects researchers across the world and supports the next generation of inequality scholars.

lmu.de

Very poor experience with PLOSOne @plos.bsky.social: Submitted a paper in July, suggesting 2 potential Academic Editors; did not hear back until Dec and asked for information; received an answer early Jan that 2 complete reviews are in and that a decision should be made soon; [continued in comments]