doleful moo of a cow

@oulipien.bsky.social

B810. The Man who Bit Himself on the Ear. A man explains to his doctor that the wound on his ear (or forehead) is where he bit himself. He explains, "I stood on a chair." Signal: oulipien.12

Gonna be interesting to see how I fare with replacing a flat bike tube when I haven't had to do so in ages, may no longer possess either levers or a spare tube, and definitely no longer possess the part that allows me to remove my theft-resistant skewers

Tabasco Diamond Reserve (2018-2018): A special edition, incredibly small-batch hot sauce, released to celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Tabasco brand. It came in a champagne-style bottle with gold foil and a fancy gold box, retailing for $35 for a 6oz bottle. What made this sauce so unique? A 🧵

A champagne-style bottle with gold foil at the top and the Tabasco logo, next to a gold box with red ribbon, also with the Tabaco logo

The idea that there might be hard things that are necessary is just 100% not acceptable to us as a culture. We are dead set against the idea of opportunity costs - that in order to do one thing you might have to refrain from doing something else - because we always think there's a Secret Trick

relatedly I find it puzzling when people invoke the latest&greatest vision science re questions like "is there perception of the world". cortex this synapse that, the argument is no stronger than if you pointed at your eye and said "well it's full of goop innit?"

doleful moo of a cow@oulipien.bsky.social · 2d ago

Easy: just say yes. I am skeptical that any neuroscientific could be given that would "look like" free will. It would be a neuroscientific account! Where would you find something that did? The details don't matter except insofar as scientists fail to think carefully about them in a given case

Easy: just say yes. I am skeptical that any neuroscientific could be given that would "look like" free will. It would be a neuroscientific account! Where would you find something that did? The details don't matter except insofar as scientists fail to think carefully about them in a given case

Michael Bench-Capon@mikebenchcapon.bsky.social · 2d ago

It's so sad when neuroscientists ignore all their expertise and just go "determinism → no free will" rather than giving our best neuroscientific account of how we make decisions and saying "even if free will and determinism are compatible in principle, does *this* look like free will to you?"

I lack the theoretical savvy to express this well, I think, but I find arguments of the form "some social/technological change allowed preferences that were really held all along finally to be expressed" extremely suspicious

Max Dubler 🏳️‍🌈@maxdubler.com · 3d ago

I think my most genuinely unpopular take is that a widely held and genuine consumer preference for cheaper, lower-quality goods, not private equity, is driving the decline in quality of consumer goods like clothing and housewares.

Here's what drives me crazy about this: It's literally been the guiding philosophy of the entire Democratic leadership for 30 years! Build the entire party around the platform that will appeal to swing districts. It's barely even repackaged! Why does she keep acting like it's "her" theory?!

Parker Molloy@parkermolloy.com · 3d ago

I really hate Elissa Slotkin's patronizing "my theory of the case is that what works in the middle of the country will work on the coasts, but not the other way around" shit. It's one of her canned lines that she uses in her eventual attempt to run for president.

Elissa Slotkin • @ElissaSlotkin
X.com
Here's my theory of the case: If Democrats can figure out how to win in the middle of the country, we can make it work everywhere else. But what works on the coasts does not automatically work in Michigan, in lowa, in Ohio. So we've got to figure out the middle first.
That is why I have been spending time in the middle of the country, in purple and red places. I've been talking with folks who voted for Trump about how they view things and what they're looking for in new Democratic leaders.
And I want to say something about the Democrats organizing in tough places.
These are people doing the hard work in red places, being good Democrats when it's hard. It is easy to show up where everyone already agrees with you. It is something else to show up where they don't, and do it anyway, because you believe it matters.
I believe it matters. And I am going to keep showing up in those places. I hope you will too.