Patrick Schneider

@patricksecon.bsky.social

Assistant Professor @ Imperial Business School, formerly LSE & Bank of England Macroeconomist interested in distributional effects of macro policy. patrickmschneider.com

Also a reminder that ‘joined up government’ sometimes means things like the Home Office giving dubious travel data to HMRC, so you just get ‘joined up dysfunction’

The real problem with the Supreme Court’s expected Fed carve out is not that it lacks a principle but that the real principle isn’t articulated. The reason it will carve out the Fed is functional but it won’t say that. And its jurisprudence doesn’t leave room to ventilate the functional arg.(1/8)

A man named Elias Rodriguez just shot dead two Israeli embassy staffers at a Jewish museum in DC, shouting “free Palestine!” An awful, criminal act that puts Israel back in a victim position. I’ve never seen a just cause attract such a high % of counterproductive “allies.” 🧵

BildBild

This Labour government’s apparently policy in office is to somehow improve growth/productivity while attempting to force a larger share of the overall workforce into lower value add employment and undermining profit centres. It’s definitively an unconventional approach!

A world historical crime, taking place in full view, with the perpetrators so convinced of their impunity that they can brag about genocidal intent, and it’s hard not to agree with their calculation that no one will stop them and no one will be held accountable

Gaza will be entirely destroyed, Israeli minister says

Bezalel Smotrich says Palestinians will ‘leave in great numbers to third countries’, raising fears of ethnic cleansing

theguardian.com

Comparisons like this really aren’t meaningful. Do the same for the 1929 crash ($34bn lost peak to trough) to see why. % down is better. This graph says more about market gains in the intervening period than losses in the last few months

Post nicht verfügbar.

The formula is a distraction. Reverse engineered to justify Trump's misguided obsession with bilateral trade deficits. The issue to focus on is how the rest of the world should respond now that the US is no longer part of the rules based trading system

The formula isn’t *that* mad - it’s exactly what chatgpt would suggest if you asked it to design a policy to eliminate trade deficits and ignore all other considerations. Terrible policy, but coherent given its single-mindedness

Ben Ansell@benansell.bsky.social · last yr.

I suppose the good news on Liberation Day is that the US decided that in the end VAT probably isn’t a tariff and just used a mad formula based on their trade deficits to figure out their ‘reciprocal’ tariffs.

Elon Musk just called Social Security a Ponzi scheme, so it’s worth reiterating: All functional retirement schemes, public or private, pre funded or pay as you go, are claims on future production - there's just no way, at scale, of storing current production for use during retirement

BildBild