Nick Hall

@penwys.bsky.social

I write, if I may. Doctorate in History (Soviet things) / novels (faintly unreal things) https://nicholasshall.com/

Thinking on threats to, particularly, Modern Languages. Languages often seen as 'problems' to solve. Achieve translation a la Star Trek and we're done. Babel predicated on the idea of this radical diversity as being bad, damaging. Yet anyone who engages with languages sincerely will know that (1/2)

A day at Ashley Court, Tiverton, writing and meeting other writers. Lovely food, excellent company, a novel commenced. Everything very cool, calm, collected. Splendid. Incredibly fortunate to have such opportunities. www.ashleycourtdevon.co.uk

Home - Ashley Court

An enchanting Regency house set in 19 acres of woodland, gardens and pasture overlooking the Exe Valley Welcome Welcome to Ashley Court This enchanting Regency house invites you to escape from modern ...

ashleycourtdevon.co.uk

I recently finished the first draft of a novel. On Wednesday I am commencing the framing of the next. I don't know where the energy comes from. It will go. Hoping to enjoy it as much as possible whilst it's here. #writing

Catching up on my PPF, this is a greatl episode that succinctly articulates what for me is a core concern - not only in historiography, but in how we live generally. Story as explainer, reducer, evocation: brill. Story that allows us to say we have answered something definitively: not brill. 1/2

Past Present Future Podcast@ppfideas.bsky.social · 3w ago

NEW EPISODE OUT NOW! Today’s bad idea is a way of doing history: David talks to historian Alec Ryrie about the seductions and pitfalls of narrative history. Why do we need more Herodotus and less Thucydides? And how can podcasts do it better? Find us at...🎧 ppfideas.com

Considering the narrowing of everything - as Musk's trillionaire-hood is live-texted on the BBC - to the whims and logics of a few fountainheads of mammon, I am increasingly convinced of the need to just... turn it all off. Just turn it all off. I didn't say I had a complex solution.

What's the word for sci-fi that predicts a far-future, but is made sufficiently long ago that elements are bizarrely anachronistic? E.g Minority Report: the newspapers have moving pictures, but they're still newspaper size and shape? Anachronism, sure, but...? Yes, I am watching Minority Report.

Reading George Saunders on writing is rather lovely, not least for the mastery with which he delivers his own moral thinking about writing. The lesson is a lesson in itself, as it were. There are rules and you can learn rules and these are good rules but also you need that ???? and off you go boy

☑ Disagreeing with other letter-writers ☑ ‘Well actually’-ing on a tangential point ❌ Celebrity namedropping yes – but not from personal acquaintance ☑ Bathetic ending to puncture the self-seriousness So competent, certainly, but not flawless adherence to the form. www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...

Cslmn@rapsacnomlas.bsky.social · last yr.

I've only just come across this terrific LRB letter from a little while back - the platonic ideal of a letter to the London Review of Books, imo.

Vol. 46 No. 12 · 20 June 2024

Martin Gorsky cites Bob Dylan’s 1964 song ‘With God on Our Side’ as evidence that Americans were aware of the Holocaust before the Six-Day War (Letters, 23 May). It’s true that the song mentions ‘the Germans’ and that ‘they murdered six million,’ although it doesn’t mention Jews. Dylan omitted these references when he recorded the song again for Bob Dylan Unplugged in 1995. The song itself isn’t really by Dylan. Its traditional Irish music is identical and its lyrics similar to ‘The Patriot Game’ by Brendan Behan’s brother Dominic. Behan called Dylan a plagiarist and a thief and berated him over the phone. Dylan, with characteristic integrity, told Behan: ‘My lawyers can speak with your lawyers.’ Behan replied: ‘I’ve got two lawyers, and they’re on the end of my wrists.’ That nothing came of the spat, not even a fistfight, is testament to the fact that Dylan’s ‘With God on Our Side’ was a dud. Nobody cared.

Benjamin Letzler
Mödling, Austria

One of the most common arguments you hear from fans of generative ‘AI’ is that it’s not plagiarizing people’s work, it’s just learning like a human learns. So I’m going to break down why that’s just not true, and why it can never be true, with the existing systems. 1/