phate

@phate.bsky.social

I don’t know how to make a social media bio

talking of media literacy, did you know that the nyt often solicits specific opinion pieces from specific people? do you think that maybe when a publication repeatedly seeks out and pays to publish the same opinions, that might reflect their values in some fashion?

Jill Filipovic@jillfilipovic.bsky.social · 5mo ago

Not including this person's handle because I don't want to start a big pile-on but there is such a deep media literacy problem on the left. "The New York Times" is not "supporting" any of the things linked; individual writers on their *opinion* pages are making the case for these positions.

I learned about a good one recently from @scriptingjapan.bsky.social. an anime character is hit with “ぬるぽ”, to see if they’re extremely online and they reflexively give the response, “ガッ”. it’s translated as epic/fail, which has nothing to do with the original meaning, but has the same sentiment.

404 Media@404media.co · 7mo ago

Translation is a delicate work that requires deep knowledge of both languages. Nuances and subtleties—two aspects of writing AIs are notoriously terrible at—can be lost or deranged if not carefully considered during the translation process.

Liberal politicians if you are so disturbed just pretend Charlie Kirk was a Palestinian child and you’ll get over it in no time

The first “amazed by chatgpt” story I remember is a person bragging about how it helped them program a “snake” game. Ah, cool, I just cloned one of the 5,000 snake game repos on Github. It took 5 seconds, and now we both have a codebase we don’t understand and don’t need.

Tressie McMillan Cottom@tressiemcphd.bsky.social · last yr.

People think they have amazing stories about ChatGPT. And they tell them all the time. You just don’t register them as amazing if you are a normal ish adult human being because it’s mid shit like, “it told me to eat brisket!” or “it wrote twenty emails no one wants!”

every time someone replies questioning this guy’s numbers, he blocks them and then makes progressively madder subskeets about it. seems like healthy behavior.

skeet by @bishopwhitewind.bsky.com : It pays for itself in like 6 months. Maybe it's a year now cuz of the Donald it doesn't matter. Y'all look at this. Look at this. Point the solar panel at the big ball in the sky. That's it. That's all there is to this. It pays for itself in a year tops even with Trump.

a photo of some shitty solar panels in a parking lot followed by a photo of the sun for some reason.

my hope is that AI can empower the Dumbest, Least talented slobs i know to replace everything i ever loved with One Million Years of Content

individual voters voting when they weren’t allowed to isn’t real. it has never changed an election outcome. Pretending this is anything besides voter suppression is pathetic. stop being a coward and just say you hate poor people.

Congressman Jared Golden@golden.house.gov · last yr.

🧵 There are a lot of misleading claims out there about the SAVE Act. Let me set the record straight: I voted for the SAVE Act for the simple reason that American elections are for Americans. Requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote is common sense.

Every developer who implements a window where the options are “maybe later” or “yes” should be thrown in a gulag forever.