Marijn van Putten

@phdnix.bsky.social

Historical Linguist; Working on Quranic Arabic and the linguistic history of Arabic and Tamazight. Game designer for Team18k

Carter in his book on Sibawayh, bizarrely claims that the pausal form of qāḍin is either qāḍī# or qāḍi#, and that the form qāḍ "is now widely accepted as correct, though only very few medieval sources explicitly refer to this form". Plenty of medieval sources refer to it... *including* Sibawayh.

BildBild

Yo guys, al-Sirāfī's commentary of Sībawayh's grammar is so good. I honestly don't know how anyone manages to make sense of Sībawayh's often incredibly convoluted prose without our buddy...

Arabic #WOTD تزعزع /tazaʕzaʕa/ (quadrilit. II) "be shaken violently" as in Anastasius of Sinai, De transfiguratione, Sin. ar. 428, fol. 297v: واذا ايقضت [كذا] البحار .. واذا تزعزعت قوات السما جمعا "if the seas were to be stirred up, if all the hosts of heaven were to be shaken violently ..."

Bild

Another interesting problem with the question of transmission is the following: We learn from al-Dānī's Ǧāmiʿ al-Bayān that the /i-humu/ form is transmitted by al-Taġlibī and al-Ṣūrī... But... this has somehow gotten lost, especially in didactic manuals that form the canon.

Marijn van Putten@phdnix.bsky.social · 2w ago

Ibn Ḏakwān mentions in his book he read both Q51:60 and Q83:31 without vowel harmony. This is reported by: - al-Ṣūrī - ʿAlī b. al-Ḥasan b. al-Ǧunayd - al-Taġlibī - ʾAḥmad b. ʾAnas. Ibn al-Muʿallā only reports Q51:60 al-ʾAḫfaš neither

So there is something slightly weird about the report of Ibn Ḏakwān in the Ǧāmiʿ al-Bayān... al-Dānī tells us that al-Taġlibī reports both Q51:60 yawmihumu llaḏī and Q83:31 ʾahlihumu nqalabū without vowel harmony for Ibn Ḏakwān... but where is he getting that info from?

Bild
Marijn van Putten@phdnix.bsky.social · 2w ago

What happens when the written records of a Quranic reading tradition conflicts with the oral? What wins out? The answer here is not always straightforward, and similar circumstances can lead to opposite outcomes. Let us have a look at two cases from al-Dānī's Ǧāmiʿ al-Bayān

What happens when the written records of a Quranic reading tradition conflicts with the oral? What wins out? The answer here is not always straightforward, and similar circumstances can lead to opposite outcomes. Let us have a look at two cases from al-Dānī's Ǧāmiʿ al-Bayān

Bild

Yesterday I was informed of the shocking news that Professor Harry Stroomer has unexpectedly passed away. He was emeritus professor of Afro-Asiatic linguistics at Leiden, and one the founding figures of Amazigh studies in Leiden. A short thread on what I'll remember him for.

Bild

It is with great sadness that we learned that Harry Stroomer, em. prof. of Afroasiatic linguistics at Leiden University has passed away. Harry was the founder of Amazigh studies in Leiden and the Doktorvater of a whole group of scholars in Amazigh studies (me included). May his soul rest in peace.

Some thoughts on NM•NH, a Libyco-Berber ethnonym that everybody on Bluesky has been wondering about for ages. In the eastern script, the dot symbol can be used to substitute for a letter. Which letters are involved is not entirely clear - Y, Z and Z² are pretty certain, but there may be more hiding

6. Arabic script is not linear!! consonants are supposed to stack!! i get accepting compromises when you’re dealing with the introduction of the printing press, but we have OpenType fonts now. ـحـ is a crime against calligraphy

28. initial hamza should *always* be transcribed in Classical Arabic and MSA. it behaves differently from ʔalif al-waṣl and i think that’s important to indicate