Political Violence New Publications and Working Papers

@polviolencepapers.bsky.social

Sharing new publications and working papers on political violence: armed conflict, civil war, insurgency, terrorism, extremism, post-conflict state/society. Tag @polviolencepapers.bsky.social to get reposted. Currently managed by @ilaydaonder.bsky.social

Although this article by @shelleyliu.bsky.social is not recent, its relevance is clear as events unfold in Syria. The study analyzes how rebels consolidate power after civil war through strategies like leveraging ties in wartime strongholds or deploying loyal bureaucrats in unsecured areas.

Michael Weintraub@miweintraub83.bsky.social · 2y ago

As we witness the extraordinary events in Syria, I recommend reading work by @shelleyliu.bsky.social on what happens when rebels take power after civil war. She highlights how wartime experiences shape post-war patterns of governance 👇🏽 dukespace.lib.duke.edu/server/api/c...

Working paper by @benckrick.bsky.social, @jonpetkun.bsky.social, and @mararevkin.bsky.social finds that civilians in areas affected by harm view armed forces as less legitimate, not only due to experiences with violence but also because of beliefs about the morality of armed forces’ conduct in war.

Mara Revkin@mararevkin.bsky.social · 2y ago

Looking forward to presenting a revised draft of my working paper with @benckrick.bsky.social & @jonpetkun.bsky.social, "Civilian Harm and Military Legitimacy in War: Evidence from the Battle of Mosul in Iraq," at the @asilorg.bsky.social Mid-Year Meeting: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Check out this new publication by @sebastianvanbaalen.se and @andresuribe.bsky.social in @cpsjournal.bsky.social. The study challenges traditional theories that consider territorial control as a prerequisite for rebel governance.

Sebastian van Baalen@sebastianvanbaalen.se · 2y ago

🆕 Excited that @andresuribe.bsky.social and my joint work is out 🔓 open-access in @cpsjournal.bsky.social We study under what conditions rebels succeed in establishing rebel governance in areas dominated by the state. A thread 🧵

 Conflictsky @polviolencepapers.bsky.social doi.org/10.1177/0010...

New article in the Journal of Politics by @shelleyliu.bsky.social examines how wartime coercive rebel governance shapes political development post-conflict, using Zimbabwe as a case to analyze the persistence of coercive control.

Shelley Liu@shelleyliu.bsky.social · 3y ago

🥳🚨 Excited to share my paper, "Coercive Legacies: From Rebel Governance to Authoritarian Control," cond. accepted at @thejop.bsky.social (paper: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....) I ask:❓How does rebel governance affect political development when rebel parties win power? #polisky 🧵 1/4

Ex-rebels govern almost a quarter of sub-Saharan Africa today. How does war affect these countries' long-run political development, and what explains their rebel regimes' longevity? The paper explores the role of coercion in rebel governance: post-war governance draws from wartime strategies, which helps to explain (1) the continued use of organized coercion in post-war politics when faced with challenges to ruling party dominance, and (2) where such coercion is most effectively employed. I examine Zimbabwe where the anti-colonial rebel party has remained in power since 1980. I rely on archival data to qualitatively trace mechanisms, map pre-war to current-day administrative divisions, and code a measure of wartime governance. I combine these data with Afrobarometer surveys to demonstrate long-run subnational variation in coercive political control. Findings deepen our understanding of war’s effects on peacetime politics and provide one explanation for infrequent political turnovers