Tom Nichols

@radiofreetom.bsky.social

Staff writer at The Atlantic. Cat guy, democracy defender. Actor for a day on Succession, Jeopardy champ. New Englander and curmudgeon.

Supermajority in California doesn't count. She was a bad candidate, she ran a bad campaign, and we've all had this argument a zillion times. She lost for a lot of reasons but "centrism" wasn't one of them.

DesertYETI@desertyeti.bsky.social · 30m ago

*AWFUL campaign *AWFUL candidate ***STILL WON THE POPULAR VOTE BY MILLIONS** Being a centrist didn't get her. Being coronated rather than vetted and not being able to be bothered to campaign in swing states sunk her.

This, also, is a stupid interpretation. People on the left point to HRC and Cuomo - two people with immense personal baggage - and say "well, see, centrists." HRC didn't lose because she's a centrist. She lost because: HRC, who ran a bad campaign, and was a bad candidate.

R5_to_philly / R5Philly@r5-to-philly.bsky.social · 1h ago

So if all of the folks that were uninspired by centrists in 2016/2024 are more likely to vote for AES and those that supported him and Stevens and McMorrow now come together, we should be in better shape come November Glad Tom is on board!!

Yes, I would say the same, and have little expectation that AES voters would support her. The voting pattern last night suggests that AES is weak in the urban areas where he needs to be strongest, but the torpedo's been launched and there's no do-over here.

Future Man@originalfutureman.bsky.social · 5h ago

If Stevens won by a slim 20k votes, would you say the same thing about the dem party? No, you wouldn’t because you believe all the El-Sayed voters would support her. Two-way street here. Dems will vote him in.