Ridhi Bandaru

@rbanda.bsky.social

🧠🐒🤖📓 bendemonium.github.io

That’s right! Are LLMs just stochastic parrots doing linear pattern matching? How do they compare to natural intelligences that do hierarchical reasoning? 🧵🪡

mukund choudhary@mukundc2k.bsky.social · 2w ago

hello CogSci 2026 people! We (@adedhe.bsky.social @rbanda.bsky.social) are excited to virtually discuss and present a sneak peek at our ongoing work comparing 🐦‍⬛, 🖥️, 🐒, 🧒, and 🧓 (very casual about the sneak there). If this piques your curiosity, stop by! Virtual Flash Talks 46-48 @ Rio CogSci Con

stochastic parrot see, stochastic parrot do: hierarchical sequence processing across artificial and biological intelligences

by mukund choudhary, ananya agrawal, ridhi bandaru, monojit choudhury, abhishek dedhe (MBZUAI, BITS Pilani, University of Waterloo)

🐸 New position paper on compositionality! 🐸 I synthesize my thoughts about the proper role/interpretation of behavior and mechanism in asking the question "Is this system (mind or machine) exhibiting compositionality?"

No Escape from Behavior in Evaluating Compositionality by Najoung Kim

If human editors can’t control who reviews science, it’s no longer peer review — it’s a rubber-stamp machine designed for volume and profit, not quality. I have no intention of attaching my name to it. So I’m out.

Tomorrow (6/2) @ the DI Summit, find ME talk about how we might estimate the "price" of hierarchical reasoning! Pull up if you're at Princeton — 9:20 am, Robertson 016 Also l'll be here til the 3rd so hmu if you want to hang out!

I think it's important for neuroscientists to reinforce this too. It's the first thing I teach in my cog neuro class. A thing isn't more real just because it's found in the brain. Every psychological thing must be in the brain at some level

Bild

New opinion piece on the interface between research on concepts and categories in minds vs. in neural network LMs! I take the position that there is much to be learned from this interface (e.g., learning about concepts from language alone) and outline some directions for future.

Title page of "Semantic Cognition for and from Language Models" followed by a figure showing tests that target conceptual structure and content vs. those that target function.

A very interesting piece by @henryconklin.bsky.social et al. on how brains and LLMs acquire abstract, meaningful internal representations by compressing the information they receive. Similar ideas in my book "How we learn"! henryconkl.in/posts/i-am-a... Full paper: henryconkl.in/posts/llms-a...

i am, myself, a lossy compression – h

a companion piece to our ICLR 2026 Paper: Learning is Forgetting: LLM Training As Lossy Compression

henryconkl.in

Excellent thread "We risk all of science if we rush to build 'AI Scientists' before we understand the value of human science." ⬇️

M.J. Crockett@mjcrockett.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Last weekend I received the Troland Research Award from the @nationalacademies.org. I’m so grateful to the communities who made this work possible. It's strange to receive this award at a time when much of the work being recognized is not eligible for federal funding. My remarks 👇 and a 🧵>>

Entering the grand halls of the NAS I felt a potent mixture of awe and fury. Science is so amazing. Not just for its material discoveries, but also for what it reveals about human values and our ability to know the world *together*. Shame on everyone who is complicit in this crisis. >>

Our conclusion: it is! We think that innateness can be a useful "orienting principle" for discussions of language learning. BUT, we don't think that classic syntactic content nativism is still a viable proposal.