Richard M Re

@richardre.bsky.social

Law Prof

New draft paper on SSRN: "Fact Avoidance," forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review Supreme Court Issue. This Essay identifies a recurring feature where the Court decides presidential power cases entirely on legal grounds without engaging at all with the facts /1 papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Fact Avoidance

<p><i><span>The legality of the President’s exercise of statutory power depends on questions of both law and fact. Yet courts often focus exclusively on the for

papers.ssrn.com

As promised, here is my post critiquing today's badly flawed Supreme Court ruling upholding Trump's withdrawal of TPS status from Haitian and other migrants. There is irony that majority's reasoning also allows future presidents to grant TPS without limit: reason.com/volokh/2026/...

The Supreme Court's Badly Flawed Ruling in the Haiti TPS Case

NA In my last post, I explained why today's Supreme Court Second Amendment ruling was right. In this one, I…

reason.com

It is difficult to read the Supreme Court's opinions over the last week and not see the general trend toward accretion of Court power. Interpretive philosophies like originalism give way to "plain text" readings (by judges) and historical "standards," without any specific guidelines. /1

Examples of this Court closing doors to litigation left open (if narrowly) during the Kennedy era: Rucho (partisan gerrymandering), Vannoy (retroactive crim pro rights), and now Cisco Systems (alien tort suits).