Romain Brette

@romainbrette.bsky.social

I think about the biology of cognition in brains and in protozoa. New book: The Brain, in Theory. http://romainbrette.fr/

My postdoc is coming to an end, so I'm looking for work! Let me know if you, or anyone you know, wants to hire a philosopher of biology/cognition with a knack for cross-disciplinary work, a focus on autonomy + agency, and experience writing for the broader public (10+ yrs in sci/tech journalism).

"Ironically, scientists have abandoned the idea that living organisms have been designed by God, only to adopt of model of the living based on artifacts made by an engineer." Ch 1 of "The Brain, in Theory" Romain Brette Princeton U. Press 2026. Ch 1 is a tour de force take down of computationalism.

“Computers can be conscious because living organisms are not special”: complete nonsense. Of course, living organisms are special: they are organized in such a way that they live; computers are not. Liquid water and ice are made of the same molecules, yet they have completely different properties.

One issue with computespeak is the constant confusion between capacity and mechanism, explanans and explanandum. Sometimes computing just means solving a problem, sometimes it's a particular way of solving a problem. Sometimes to represent is just to know, sometimes it's to encode.

1/8 Two years ago I wrote a chapter for an MIT Press book "Designing an Intelligence", edited by George Konidaris, which looks like it will be published later this year. My chapter, "Intelligence without Intelligence", poses 12 provocative questions about implicit assumptions.

A good rebuttal of computational functionalism, specifically of the thought experiment where you progressively replace each neuron by an electronic equivalent. (TLDR: the thought experiment assumes what it claims to demonstrate, ie, that a living cell is equivalent to some electronic component)

Yogi Jaeger@yoginho.spore.social.ap.brid.gy · last mo.

RE: https://spore.social/@yoginho/116713305282040683 The Cyborg Myth: now also available on #LoveAndPhilosophy! https://lovephilosophy.substack.com/p/the-cyborg-myth Why you can't replace your neurons with artificial devices and still be you. Computational functionalism isn't logically […]

L'esprit humain est fascinant. M. Klein a apparemment réussi à se convaincre que plagier c'est ok tant que le texte plagié est bon.

Jean Abbiateci@jeanabbiateci.bsky.social · last mo.

Dans @philomag.com (mensuel dans lequel il tient une chronique), Etienne Klein répond sur le perte de son doctorat et les révélations de plagiat dans toute sa production. L’interview, menée par le directeur et le rédacteur en chef, est assez pugnace. À lire ici ⤵️ www.philomag.com/articles/eti...

Collègues, regardez bien les nouvelles règles de l'ANR. Bonne chance pour faire de la recherche fondamentale!

Julien Gossa@juliengossa.cpesr.fr · last mo.

[ #VeilleESR #LPPR ] Durcissement des règles d'attribution pour l'appel à projets générique ANR. Notamment : réduction du nombre de dépôts et augmentation du délais de carence. L'argumentaire est : plus les scientifiques ont besoin de l'ANR, moins il faut que les scientifiques sollicitent l'ANR.