@ruthtunn.bsky.social

The CONSORT and SPIRIT statements for randomized trials have been updated for 2025 and published in JAMA, with a new focus on open science principles and guidance on trial registration, data access, and conflict of interest reporting. ➡ CONSORT 2025: ja.ma/3Yyu0Hh ➡ SPIRIT 2025: ja.ma/3YjFfn8

Following on from the recent CONSORT 2025 publication, SPIRIT 2025 has now landed 🥳 It's aligned with CONSORT for streamlined reporting; open science is front & center; and PPI makes a welcome appearance. Plus much more! 🎂 Happy trial protocol reporting, y'all🎂

Gary Collins@gscollins.bsky.social · last yr.

NEW PAPER: Updated SPIRIT-2025 for reporting protocols of randomised trials is now available in the @BMJ.com, @JAMA.com, @thelancet.bsky.social, @PLoS.org, and @natmedicine.bsky.social. —> www.bmj.com/content/389/... #openscience #transparency #medsky #statssky #episky

CONSORT 2025 has landed! Including, among other changes, new items on reporting: ⚕️patient and public involvement 💉intervention delivery ☠️harms ❓missing data handling 👐data sharing 💰author conflicts of interest ...and an enhanced emphasis on open science practices. New website: consort-spirit.org

Home | consort-spirit.org

consort-spirit.org

Gary Collins@gscollins.bsky.social · last yr.

NEW PAPER: Updated CONSORT-2025 for reporting randomised trials is now available in the @bmj.com @jama.com , @thelancet.bsky.social, @plos.org and @naturemedicine.bsky.social —> www.bmj.com/content/389/... #openscience #transparency #medsky #statssky #episky

📢 COS seeks new members for its Preregistration Template Evaluation Working Group! This volunteer group includes community members from diverse academic backgrounds & global regions with expertise in research methodology, reporting guidelines, & preregistration. Apply here: www.cos.io/blog/appl...

Applications Open: Preregistration Template Evaluation Working Group

As part of efforts to recognize and appreciate volunteer contributors, the Center for Open Science (COS) is inviting new applications to its Preregistration Template Working Group.

cos.io

'Eighty per cent of respondents thought policymakers lack sufficient understanding of science — but 73% said that researchers don’t understand how policy works. “It’s a constant tension between the scientifically illiterate and the politically clueless”' doi.org/10.1038/d415...

Science could solve some of the world’s biggest problems. Why aren’t governments using it?

A Nature global survey finds that most specialists are unhappy with systems to provide science advice to policymakers.

doi.org