Sanjay Srivastava

@sanjaysrivastava.com

I’m a reasonable man, get off my case. sanjaysrivastava.com

I am pleased to report that the sea lion hating, ICE-funding-but-didn't-mean-it voting, bright headlight regulating, college fetish party throwing Democrat that Bluesky loves to hate, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, is winning her primary

I see a lot of you talking about "dopamine" and I wish you'd go back to talking about your astrological signs because at least then you wouldn't be confusing yourself about a real thing

I walked through the Seattle Center on my way to work this morning. My usual route takes me right through the site of Sunday’s mass shooting. There was a memorial, and a news crew was recording a segment 1/

A news crew records a reporter. To the right is a memorial.A memorial with a wreath on a stand, bouquets in the ground, and a row of white pillar candles.

I opened that Emily Wilson review and it said right at the top it's over 4000 words. I'm just in it for the drama so I think I'll stick to the discourse on Bluesky, The Sports and Literary Criticism App

SEATTLE friends: Cat-in-real-life alert! I am in Seattle this week and decided to host a small (limited spots) Psychology of Software Teams happy hour this thursday July 30th, 4-6pm. RSVP here for location & to secure a spot: luma.com/lxcmtn68

The Psychology of Software Teams: Seattle happy hour edition · Luma

Let's talk about being more human in tech! Join a small group for a happy hour meetup talking about getting better psychology in our software and technical…

luma.com

I usually watch videos and move on. This one with Ed Yong I re-watched every few months. It's about why he quit his job (burnout) and how he moved away from defining his self-worth as based only on what he produced at work. For burnout, see esp. 28:28 forward.

Ed Yong · Videos · XOXO

Avid birder and Pulitzer-winning science journalist Ed Yong built a devoted audience for his deeply empathetic coverage of the pandemic for The Atlantic, while his two New York Times bestsellers, I Co...

xoxofest.com

Imagine that in pre-publication peer review, the reliability of a 3-reviewer composite is .70. The journal accepts the top 10% of papers according to average review score. What is the reliability of the original reviewers in the subset of published papers? (Answer in alt text)

The reliability coefficient is -.77. No, the negative sign is not a typo.

Since I'm seeing this paper popping up in my feed: This doesn't mean what people seem to think it means. H1 Connect is a post-pub recommendation service. Low paper variance is exactly what you'd expect if peer review is *very good* at translating expert consensus into publication decisions

Alejandro Montenegro@aemonten.bsky.social · 2w ago

"Here we show, in a large post-publication peer review database, that research assessment is driven more by differences between evaluators than by difference in the evaluated research. " arxiv.org/abs/2607.09783