Sarah Otner

@sarahotner.bsky.social

Professor of Org. Theory & Innovation. Lapsed swimmer and diver, resumed dancer, jogger-in-training. Data wonk, travel geek, foodie. Studies #fragrance, #architecture, #books, #metascience. Loves dogs & crime fiction. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2743-8462

We have suggested that most of this won’t go down well with students but they don’t care. Ironically they’re trying to put forward one of my abolished modules as a TEF and accessibility excellence case study, whether I stay or go. Infuriating.

Over the last 20 plus years of attending academic conferences I've watched the assistant professor and graduate student presenters become increasingly more methodological sophisticated and the methods become increasingly complex. And it's hard to keep up.

We need to learn from countries that are further ahead in thinking about how to deal with wildfires. This includes controlled fires to create firebreaks, households making their homes more defensible and total fire bans in periods of highest risk www.ft.com/content/5481...

‘Black Summer’: how Australia rethought its wildfire strategy

Fire-prone country relies on earlier warnings and better data to stay ahead of increasingly destructive blazes

ft.com

Alright don't make me regret this: Doing some revisions to the Future of Work grad class. Who's got serious research about actually existing AI in actual workplaces? Closer to the shopfloor the better, we traditionally use each week for a different domain (health, transport, etc).

The “because AI” explanation for redundancies might be true. Not because AI is replacing human labor, rather because the amount of money sunk into AI requires costs be cut somewhere, fast, and labor has traditionally been the first cost to be cut by Mr Corporation.

A side-note to this thread, and a direct rebuke to anyone who says “Eh you must just be a bad teacher”: One reason it’s all so demoralizing is that Andrew’s teaching materials are exemplary. Just incredibly good. Go look at them. When someone like him is despairing, things are real bad.

Kieran Healy@kjhealy.co · 4w ago

If students are simply uninterested in the core bargain of a class like this, it’s hard to know what to do. You teach the material because you think it’s important they know it; they don’t give a shit, but want the credential; and the university wants their money. Your main option is “pretend”.

If students are simply uninterested in the core bargain of a class like this, it’s hard to know what to do. You teach the material because you think it’s important they know it; they don’t give a shit, but want the credential; and the university wants their money. Your main option is “pretend”.

Andrew Heiss@andrew.heiss.phd · 4w ago

woof ≈80% of assignments this summer term have essentially been just raw chatgpt/claude output, including assignments that required designing stuff in illustrator/affinity/canva. The battle is lost for asynchronous online courses.

When something is so obviously a terrible idea, it is ok to just...say no thanks and ban it. We don't have to wait 15 years and then slowly ban if after a whole bunch of irreperable damage has been done to individuals and society.

Bild

Visiting my university’s new, expensively-refurbished space for startup incubators and senior management and cannot imagine a better illustration of the American university at this moment in time than a breathlessly press-released “collaboration room” featuring a single desk and chair.

A room labelled “collaboration room” featuring a single desk and chair.

What a great article not only on faculty workloads, but how little our salaries actually factor in to most university budgets. A few highlights. First, our salaries are falling:

Third, faculty salaries are falling even if we statistically control for faculty rank and institution. By our analysis of National Center for Education Statistics data, tenured and tenure-track salaries are down 10 percent in real terms since 2016 and are lower today than they were in 2002; nontenured faculty salaries are down 4 percent since 2016 and are at 2002 levels today.

To put this plainly: Suppose sharply increased teaching loads enabled institutions to cut one out of every seven full-time faculty. (That’s roughly what we saw last year in severe cuts announced at West Virginia, Western Illinois, and St. Cloud State Universities.) The associated savings in salary and benefits even through such drastic action would amount to less than 2.5 percent of total institutional expenditures for the typical university.

The upshot? If you think higher education has a cost problem, squeezing more teaching out of faculty is not the first place you should look.

Perhaps now is the time to see if even a small subset of them and their many fellow prominent alums could assist Sussex to navigate these treacherous waters? There's a lot to be saved at Sussex. It's a gem of a university with a distinctive history in both teaching and research.

I'm really sorry to hear this news. The Research Professional team are excellent and have helped the HE and research sector keep up with what is happening. We will be less intelligent without it. Good luck to individual staff members affected, who are excellent writers and journos.

John Morgan@johnmorgan3.bsky.social · last mo.

Very sad to be sharing this news: Research Professional News to discontinue publication at end of 2026. www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-o...

Request, please: I'm looking for a trainer experienced in Elite, Expert, & Stakeholder Interviewing Technique (Social Sciences & Management). Workshop will be October/November 2026, all academic levels but likely 50/50 newbies/refresher. Thanks!

Yes! In a paper I recently edited, I wrote this to the author. "You will see that reviewer 3 is an inordinate fan of Dr. ____. While I have no doubts that this work is excellent, I was unable to find the connection to your present paper and encourage you to be judicious in following their advice."