Shiela Appavoo MD

@shielaappavoo.bsky.social

🇨🇦#radiologist, Breast Imager. #radvocacy #MedSky Content experts should be fully involved in guidelines.

There is a recurring pattern of institutional research integrity offices shielding influential clinical studies and the researchers responsible for them from accountability, and ignoring harm to the public. This is far from an isolated incident.

Cheryl White@ladyscorcher.bsky.social · last yr.

This paper needs to be retracted. The study contained errors that harmed me but at this point it’s seeming more like fraud not to retract it. Let’s get it done befor any more young women are harmed. @uoft.bsky.social @uoftmedicine.bsky.social @cmaj-jamc.bsky.social

For what it’s worth, here’s the editorial I sent the Globe and Mail April 5. The Globe took a pass. Balancing Individual Rights and Community Health Requires Knowledge of History

I have started to refer to it as "RCT Fundamentalism", as the EBM movement seems to have embraced a kind of nihilism, where only randomized trials have standing to be considered evidence. And that is starting to generate policy and practice that flies in the face of evidence, broadly stated

A thread on quality, evidence and EBM: Clinical research often labels evidence as "high quality" or "low quality," but how reliable are these categories? How meaningful is this "quality" construct?

One of the strongest arguments against allowing secretive bodies like the Canadian Task Force on Preventative Health Care to make guidance in back rooms, without transparency or scientific oversight, is the behaviour they exhibit when forced out into the open. canadahealthwatch.ca/2025/03/11/h...

Health guidelines should be transparent. The Task Force’s aren’t

The Task Force oversimplifies the criticisms of its detractors.

canadahealthwatch.ca

So apparently the government asked a group of experts in EBM to review the work of the task force and based on that review the government has asked the task force to pause their work for a month.

Shiela Appavoo MD @shielaappavoo.bsky.social · last yr.

The pause on the Task Force was the result of an External Experts Review (EER) by a panel of many well qualified individuals, including family docs and population specialists. www.canada.ca/en/public-he... Ask yourself why the critical context of that EER is not mentioned in the letter… 🤔