Sina Blassnig

@sinajb.bsky.social

Prof. of Digital Communication & Datafication @unifr.bsky.social and FHGR. Director of the IDCMI (https://www.unifr.ch/idcmi/). Digital journalism, media innovation, political communication, AI & algorithms. Feminist. She/her

Weili Wang, Xi‘an Jaotong & John Downey present an international comparison of utopian and dystopian media narratives around generative AI, showing that these narratives very much depend on the context, being much more positive in China and India as compref to the UK and USA. #ica2025 #journalism

Bild

There are three categories of Trump transgressions. The first are bad things he does, which must be highlighted in all their harms to voters. The second is bad things he says, which while harmful to the culture we are better ignoring. But the third, here, are bad things he proposes. 1/n

jamelle@jamellebouie.net · 2y ago

the constitution is a public and political document as much as a legal one and constitutional meaning is a public and political process. trump can say X but other political institutions, and the nation’s various publics, have to agree for it to mean anything

We're trying to see if there's a regional aspect to this, so if you've got instagram and want to help out, could you check these hashtags, and report back the result along with which country you're in? #bluewave #democrat #voteblue #dnc #January6 #jan6 #j6ers #capitolattack #obama #biden #pelosi

Eliot Higgins@eliothiggins.bsky.social · 2y ago

Searching #liberal or #democrat on Instagram now returns "We've hidden these results", #Republican has no such problem. Seems bad.

"Trumps Kommunikation nur populistisch zu nennen, verharmlost, wie extremistisch seine Ideen sind. Hier müssen wir klarer von Autoritarismus, Rassismus und der Idee der White Supremacy, also der rassistischen Idee der Überlegenheit von weissen Personen, sprechen." @sinajb.bsky.social

Du willst den Trump-Aus-Button? «Den zukünftigen US-Präsidenten kann man nicht ignorieren»

Donald Trump verschiebt die Grenzen des Sagbaren. Eine Kommunikationsexpertin erklärt, warum Ignorieren keine Lösung ist – und was Medien besser machen sollten.

watson.ch

The European Fact-Checking Standards Network responds to Meta slashing fact-checking: “Fact-checking is not censorship, far from that, fact-checking adds speech to public debates, it provides context and facts for every citizen to make up their own mind” Full statement ⬇️ efcsn.com/news/2025-01...

EFCSN disappointed by end to Meta’s Third Party Fact-Checking Program in the US; Condemns statements linking fact-checking to censorship – European Fact-Checking Standards Network (EFCSN)

7 January 2025 – The European Fact-Checking Standards Network (EFCSN) is disappointed by  Meta’s decision to end its Third Party...

efcsn.com

Fact-checking wasn’t “biased” against conservatives. Conservatives just shared more false content. If there’s a sportsball game and one team fouls four times as much, it’s not “biased” for the ref to call four times as many fouls against that team.

David Rand@dgrand.bsky.social · 2y ago

🚨In Nature🚨 Meta is dropping fact-checking to avoid anti-conservative bias- but is there actually evidence of bias? We this test empirically & find that conservatives * ARE suspended more * BUT share more misinfo So suspension isn't necessarily evidence of bias www.nature.com/articles/s41...