Susan R Burgess

@srburgess.bsky.social

Distinguished Prof. Emerita, Ohio University, law/courts, LGBTQ politics, social movements, radicals, pop culture. I edit a book series in LGBTQ politics at NYU Press - contact me re your project. Also a fan of music, animals, nature. Chicago. Dublin.

US legal history is not linear and one of inexorable progress. For wins like the Voting Rights Act and Roe v Wade, there will be a long fight to roll it back, and we must fight anew once more. There is no "deep precedent" that can stand the test of time if the losing side doesn't stop fighting.

Moby Dick@mobydickatsea.bsky.social · last mo.

There is no steady unretracing progress in this life; we do not advance through fixed gradations, and at the last one pause

Massie: "I think it's ironic that we control the House, Senate, Supreme Court, and the White House, and we're yelling 'election fraud'? I mean, we won all the damn elections."

Call for Interview Participants! My @researchireland.ie study exploring women’s experiences of online harassment and abuse in Irish academia is seeking insights from those impacted to help increase awareness and support. To share your story please email: gboastudy@universityofgalway.ie

Bild

Breaking: South Carolina Senate just failed to invoke cloture on 7-0 gerrymandered map eliminating Jim Clyburn's majority Black district. It appears redistricting is dead for real this time as early voting begins today & 32,000 ballots already cast

if your opening gambit is an obviously false assertion — that there was an entire literature challenging the conventional view of birthright citizenship — and then you work your way backwards into an argument, you are a hack and a liar no matter how certain you are that you are right

Anthony Michael Kreis@anthonymkreis.bsky.social · 2mo ago

In which Professor Wurman candidly admits why he sees the history of the common law differently than anyone who has honestly studied it, and why rather than doing scholarship he just wrote and op-ed and a (terrible, demonstrably wrong) article about the common law that should have been rejected.

The Callais ruling is the latest evidence that the real problem with #SCOTUS is that it can do whatever it wants without any fear of pushback from Congress. The way to fix that is by making the Court *accountable* again, something that expanding it or imposing term limits won't actually accomplish:

Bonus 223: "They Are Who We Thought They Were"

The Callais ruling has prompted renewed calls for Court reform. It's also a reminder of why the most popular proposals *aren't* how we should fix the Court.

stevevladeck.com