Sander W van der Laan

@swvanderlaan.bsky.social

Assist. Prof. @UMC_Utrecht @AtheroExpress | cardiovascular genetics | @AtheroNL @EAS @StrokeGenetics | father of 3 | 👨🏽‍💻 | @OpenSciUtrecht

After lunch, Inge Stegeman, with "Open Science to Increase Reproducibility in Science: The OSIRIS Project" - osiris4r.eu Is Open Science going to solve all our problems with reproducibility? Are there benefits or harms? Let's study this! We got funding and a good group from all over Europe #WCRI2026

Speaker on the left, her title slide on the right

“Research-integrity analysts are warning that ‘journal snatchers’ — companies that acquire scholarly journals from reputable publishers — are turning legitimate titles into predatory, low-quality publications with questionable practices” #HigherEd #Journals 🧪 #Research www.nature.com/articles/d41...

Invasion of the ‘journal snatchers’: the firms that buy science publications and turn them rogue

Study finds dozens of journals that have hiked their fees and started churning out papers after being acquired by small, recently formed companies.

nature.com

Tim Peters wrote a ✨ great blogpost ✨in laymen's terms on our paper. Check it out here 👉🏽 www.vanderlaanscience.nl/news/phenomicl

LinkedIn

This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn

lnkd.in

Sander W van der Laan@swvanderlaan.bsky.social · last yr.

🚀 Thrilled to announce our latest #preprint on intraplaque haemorrhage (IPH) quantification and molecular 🧬characterisation of carotid plaques using deep learning. A thread 🧵👇🏽

Excited to finally share our work on attention-based multiple instance learning to quantify and characterize intraplaque haemorrhage in carotid plaque whole slide images from >2500 patients in AtheroExpress. Fun collaboration with @swvanderlaan.bsky.social and Craig Glastonbury labs.

Sander W van der Laan@swvanderlaan.bsky.social · last yr.

🚀 Thrilled to announce our latest #preprint on intraplaque haemorrhage (IPH) quantification and molecular 🧬characterisation of carotid plaques using deep learning. A thread 🧵👇🏽

'Exploiteren wij/zij-denken, ontmenselijken minderheden, verspreiden complottheorieën, hameren op vijandbeelden, je minder radicaal voordoen dan je bent, opjutten jongeren, heldenverering, ondermijnen rechtsstaat, kritiek verdacht maken, verzet kop indrukken – herkenbaar?' www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/...

Lessen trekken uit het nazisme: menselijk fatsoen blijkt uiterst fragiel

Geschiedenis: Een groot kenner van de geschiedenis van het nazisme laat zien: de mentaliteit en de technieken van Hitler en consorten zijn allesbehalve verleden tijd. The Nazi Mind zou ons aan het den...

nrc.nl

Leaders have been saying "let's make every scientists a communicator" for decades. I'd say we have evidence that isn't the answer. It's an example of the scholastic fallacy - which says scientists think everyone thinks about things the same way we do.

Jess Hardie@jesshardie.bsky.social · last yr.

I am pretty tired of this argument. Journal articles and books are sometimes not widely accessible (although some are), but academics speak much more often to the public now, through the media, op eds, trade books, and public lectures, than in the past and anti-intellectualism has grown.

There is strong evidence of Russian intervention and influence in recent Western voting - not least in the USA with the election of a president who echoes Russian propaganda, fires military top brass, weakens alliances, threatens neighbours,, drops cyber security against Russia and bullies Ukraine.