Con Flambers

@themagicconch19.bsky.social

Tempered optimist. Wisconsin politics and other things. Certified EMT. Opinions are mine and mine alone. He/him Blog doing deep dives on politics and history here - https://delving-deeper.ghost.io.

In seriousness, I remember at the start of the summer coming across a very touching video of Abdul El-Sayed talking to a woman at a town hall in the UP who had been struggling with a cancer diagnosis + paying for healthcare. That's an issue that hits close to home for me!

One county in Michigan that's reported little: Genesee, home of Flint. Only 24% in. Some notable areas that we have little to nothing from -Flint -Saginaw -Kalamazoo -Dearborn -Flint -Marquette -Lots of non-Detroit parts of Wayne County generally

I think an honest evaluation of the evidence suggests that El-Sayed is clearly favored, but that his victory is going to be in the single digits, and thus below expectations (seems like the conventional wisdom had him winning more in the 10-15 range, and that sounded reasonable to me)

My eyebrows raised a bit when I saw Stevens was winning Marquette County, the lone blueberry in the UP's sea of tomato soup (not my line). And then I saw it was ~10% reported. Good reminder to not draw broad conclusions from small portions of votes.

Re rural Michigan's results: seems like El-Sayed is doing well in the UP and on the cherry coast (northwest Michigan) and Stevens is doing very well in mid Michigan and northern Michigan more broadly.

In WI-03 news: there's a type of guy who loves to reply to Rebecca Cooke posts, I guess in the hopes that she's looking for love in the comments of her campaign accounts, because that's clearly where one goes to look for human connection: amid a torrent of weirdos calling you a communist

Part of me would like to vote for Roys, since I actually do like her, but like... a good poll for her has her at like 6% lol Personally, my experience of this primary has less been "oh my god, it's so negative!" (has felt honestly mostly rather tame) and more so, "oh my god, this is unsatisfying"

I'm not a Special Politics Guy so I don't get to see this stuff, but I think one way you can understand Evers' odd behavior in our gov primary is that the WisDems have polling data showing Hong losing to Tiffany. That suddenly makes his decisions a bit more discernible. Just speculation, of course!

Tbh looking at these (Very early) drops, think the expectation at this point is if El-Sayed basically meets or exceeds expectations (my understanding is the conventional wisdom has him winning by low double digits or so, that's def what the polls have looked like). But if he cracks, say, 60%...

Susan Collins announcing she'll vote against a controversial nominee is basically the moment it becomes clear that nominee will be confirmed. It means Thune has enough votes to confirm, and thus, Collins gets a pass to look independent.

"The way to stop fascism is to improve peoples' lives" is a real [citation needed] moment. Life expectancy under Biden went up after it dropped under Trump, overdose deaths started to drop, more people than ever had healthcare. Were things perfect? No. Are they any better now, tho?

Pretty clear that Tom Tiffany's campaign strategy is to portray himself as the moderate choice: highlight Hong's past comments on wanting to abolish the police, do some good ole red baiting, and vaguely talk about cost of living issues. Just don't ask him about his voting record in the House.