📄 New working paper out: osf.io/preprints/so... We (@thiloalbers.bsky.social @felixkersting.bsky.social and Fabian Kosse) try to understand why some citizens who are objectively well off still feel left behind, and why this matters for populist attitudes.
Timo Wiesner
@twiesner.bsky.social
Doctoral researcher @sociumbremen / @unibremen interested in perceptions and evaluations of economic inequality.
Gibt es einen Generationenkonflikt am Arbeitsplatz? Was ist dran an den Klischees über Ältere und Jüngere und deren unterschiedlichen Vorstellungen vom Arbeitsleben? Marcel Knobloch, @llhipp.bsky.social und @sophiahunger.bsky.social haben nach altersbezogenen Stereotypen am Arbeitsplatz gefahndet.
Analysis of our #data was conducted for research on #inequality and wellbeing published by the Journal of Happiness Studies (@springernature.com). Sandra Bohmann and Fabian Kalleitner (@lmu.de 🇩🇪 ) investigated whether perceived unfair inequality has a negative effect on #wellbeing.
Subjective Inequity Aversion: How Perceived Unfair Inequality Affects Subjective Well-being - Journal of Happiness Studies
Combining theoretical insights from social justice literature and social comparison research, this paper argues that subjective perceptions of inequity (i.e., unfairness), rather than objective deviations from equality, are key to understanding the relationship between (in)equality and subjective well-being.
buff.ly
Having run similar analyses a while back, I raised an eyebrow when I looked at Fig. 3 of this paper. Examining the code shows that the labels may have been swapped: "Concerned winners" are no more likely to support the AfD than "unconcerned losers" (contrary to what is reported in the paper).
Using German SOEP 2014-2024…concern about immigration accounts for 75% of variation in AfD support and 90% of variation in voting behaviour. “Therefore, variables that measure deprivation explain comparatively little.” @martinschroeder.bsky.social ! journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...
Having run similar analyses a while back, I raised an eyebrow when I looked at Fig. 3 of this paper. Examining the code shows that the labels may have been swapped: "Concerned winners" are no more likely to support the AfD than "unconcerned losers" (contrary to what is reported in the paper).
Using German SOEP 2014-2024…concern about immigration accounts for 75% of variation in AfD support and 90% of variation in voting behaviour. “Therefore, variables that measure deprivation explain comparatively little.” @martinschroeder.bsky.social ! journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...
NEW - The Equality Positions and Policies of Governments, 1970–2020: How Egalitarian Parties Evoke Equality While Evading Real Redistribution - https://cup.org/3TLOKfb - @alexanderhorn.bsky.social & @leoahrens.bsky.social #OpenAccess
This article draws on qualitative data to argue that specific, individualised and binary framings of merit and non-merit beliefs in conventional accounts under-explore the varied ways in which people recognise structural processes. #EarlyView in #BJS ➡️ onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
Subjective Social Inequalities, Lay Perceptions of Merit and Puzzles of Explanation
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
New paper out NOW! 🎉 Do people care enough about unfair inequality for it to affect their subjective well-being? And does it matter whose earnings they perceive as unfair (their own, the rich, or the poor)? We find: not all perceived unfairness is equal. link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Today we launch the new version of The PopuList! The PopuList provides an overview of far-left, far-right and populist parties in 31 European countries from 1989 until 1 May 2026. Explore the new website here: popu-list.org
Home - The PopuList
The PopuList Interactive Version 4.0 Static Version 4.0 CSV Version 4.0 What is the PopuList? The PopuList offers researchers, journalists, […]
popu-list.org
Just out in @socialforcesfan.bsky.social some of our work comparing Elites in Brazil and South Africa! Using a small survey with random sample of CEOs, legislators, and top bureaucrats in both countries, we unpack the contradictory ways elite think about merit and taxation and redistrution.
Very happy to see our book "Trigger Points" finally out in English, and fully open access! Hopefully a useful resource for anyone working on polarization, class, inequality, migration, diversity, and climate change.
Why do our societies seem so deeply divided when most citizens actually occupy a broad political middle ground? @steffenmau.bsky.social, @thomaslux.bsky.social & @lwestheuser.bsky.social unpack this paradox in Trigger Points, pub. today @brisunipress.bsky.social, Foreward @mikesavagelse.bsky.social
📢 New OA paper in JEMS @scmrjems.bsky.social We assume migrants evaluate destination countries in terms of jobs and opportunities. But many migrants in my study valued something else: living in a society where those who fall on hard times are not left behind. 🔓 doi.org/10.1080/1369...
Postdoc position with Wiebke Schulz at Uni Bremen on gender inequalities in access to and consequences of AI. Applications due 25 June. www.uni-bremen.de/en/universit...
It's way past time, so here comes the spring/summer 2026 update of the #FarRight bibliography. It's the third-largest ever and brings you 130 shiny new references, most of them published in the last 12 months. Buckle up for a 🧵 (or click the link for the article. Or do both?)
🏆 Congratulations to the winners of the 2026 SER Best Article Prize! Winning articles by #GillesIvaldi & #OscarMazzoleni and @elizaclairebrown.bsky.social were recognized for their contributions to socio-economic research. 🔗 sase.org/awards/ser-b... #SASE #SocioEconomicReview
SER Best Article Prize - SASE
sase.org
New article out in @wepsocial.bsky.social, with Lucca Hoffeller: doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2026.2662884 We add a new perspective to research on congruence and political support: Group-based congruence, where citizens’ support depends on how well their social group’s preferences are represented. 🧵
Meine Studie zeigt, dass die Presse nur selten über die reichsten Deutschen berichtet; wenn, dann konzentriert sich die Berichterstattung auf bekannte Persönlichkeiten und variiert je nach historischem Ursprung des Vermögens (doi.org/10.1177/00380385261428292). Erklärt hier in der @zeit.de:
Wer viel besitzt, bleibt gern unerkannt. Eine Studie hat den verborgenen Wohlstand in Deutschland vermessen. Und zeigt, wie Anonymität den Reichsten nützt.
Bewerbungsschluss morgen: Im Projekt "Knowledge, Epistemic Marginalization, and the Politics of Resentment" (Co-PI: Joachim Blatter) gibt es eine Postdocstelle an der Uni Bremen. Vertragsdauer: 3,5 Jahre Stelle: 100% Bewerbung: Bis 05.05. Stellenausschreibung: www.uni-bremen.de/universitaet...
Offene Stellen - Universität Bremen
Offene Stellen
uni-bremen.de
Deutschlands Reichste werden laut einer neuen Studie kaum in den Medien erwähnt. Dieser Vorhang des Schweigens verhindert eine aufgeklärte Debatte über Ungleichheit, schreibt @maxhsr.bsky.social.
📢 We're hiring for my project RESPOL on residential mobility & electoral realignment 📍 University of Hamburg 📅 4y, 75% FTE 🔍 pol behavior, comp politics, regional inequalities 📊 quant, administrative & survey data Please share with talented MA students! 🔗 www.uni-hamburg.de/en/stellenan...
Job advertisement
uni-hamburg.de
Out now in #Socio-EconomicReview ( @sasemeeting.bsky.social) "Individual ideology and biased perceptions of relative income position" Jointly with @mbusemeyer.bsky.social (@excinequality.bsky.social) & @nathaliegiger.bsky.social 🔗 academic.oup.com/ser/advance-...
One week left to apply:
I am looking for a postdoc to join my team at the University of Bremen. 5-year-contract, top-up to 100% possible for most of the contract period. Apply by 04 May 2026. If you have questions about the position, send me an email! www.uni-bremen.de/en/universit...
🚨 Job Alert We are loooking for a 3year Postdoc @excinequality.bsky.social Work with @mbusemeyer.bsky.social, Sebastian Koos, and me Focus: computational social science, analysis of political texts, future-oriented policies and parties 📅Apply by June 5th stellen.uni-konstanz.de/jobposting/c...
🚨 New Open Access publication In my new paper in Social Justice Research, I explore how migration experiences—and crucially, when migration happens—shape attitudes toward distributive justice. 📖 Read the full (open access) paper here: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
New Publication in the British Journal of Sociology on „Hot Politics“ and Trigger Points.
Knife crime! Pronouns! Meat bans! Some political issues lead to "hotter", more emotional and polarizing debates than others. We show how these "trigger points" reveal a contested structure of moral expectations and how they get weaponized by polarization entrepreneurs. OA @bjsociology.bsky.social 🧵
The first paper of my dissertation is published now in @sociologyjnl.bsky.social! Press coverage of the richest Germans is rare but focused on a minority of highly visible individuals and varies along the historical origins of fortunes. doi.org/10.1177/00380385261428292
NEW: Wiebke Schulz, Ineke Maas, Marco H.D. van Leeuwen, "Socio-Economic Advancement and Long-Term Trends in the Gender Gap in Early Career Occupational Status in France 1860–1960." sociologicalscience.com/articles-v13...
sociologicalscience.com
New in @europeansocreview.bsky.social with brilliant @kostermann.bsky.social & @patzinaalex.bsky.social 🌟 Apprenticeship dropout is known to be associated with €€€ penalties, but less clear whether dropout causes later income losses. Matters for policy: what should interventions target?
Stratified scars: social inequality in the labour market consequences of apprenticeship dropout
Abstract. While the association between apprenticeship dropout and negative labour market consequences is well documented, the causal link and social strat
doi.org
Extremely happy that my first single-authored paper is now published (open access) at @EJPRjournal: “Asymmetric backlash against structural economic change: the electoral consequences of the coal phase-out in Germany” Here's a summary thread... 1/n
Why Inequalities Persist: Parties’ (Non)Responses to Economic Inequality, 1970–2020 By Alexander Horn, University of Konstanz, Martin Haselmayer, University of Applied Sciences Campus Vienna and University of Vienna, and K. Jonathan Klüser, University of Zurich Do parties respond to inequality?…
Why Inequalities Persist: Parties’ (Non)Responses to Economic Inequality, 1970–2020
By Alexander Horn, University of Konstanz, Martin Haselmayer, University of Applied Sciences Campus Vienna and University of Vienna, and K. Jonathan Klüser, University of Zurich Do parties respond to inequality? Despite the relevance of inequality and its consequences, existing studies fail to capture parties’ emphasis on economic equality and redistribution or to differentiate between existing levels of inequality and increases in inequality.
politicalsciencenow.com