Wilson King

@wilsonmking.bsky.social

PhD Student at Berkeley ARE • Former J-PAL/LSE • Development Economics, Global Health, Science of Science, et al • 🏃‍♂️🚵🗺🌈

Exactly this. Reviewing foreign aid for consistency w/admin policy goals is reasonable. Many programs can absorb a 90 day pause w/o catastrophic impact. But a real stop work on bi-partisan malaria & HIV programs--delivering lifesaving medicines & bednets--quite literally means people will die.

Charles Kenny@charlesjkenny.bsky.social · 2y ago

Glad to read there has been a waiver for emergency food aid, but the same has to urgently apply to other programs providing life-saving support where 90 days could be too late: PEPFAR, PMI... www.reuters.com/world/us/tru...

In economics, editors, referees, and authors often behave as if a published paper should reflect some kind of authoritative consensus. As a result, valuable debate happens in secret, and the resulting paper is an opaque compromise with anonymous co-authors called referees. 1/

Bild

Today's #econjmp is by Steven Brownstone (UCSD). He does a village level RCT in Telangana, India, introducing drum seeders to rice farmers. He shows mechanization by some farmers then lowers the wages others have to pay, & how this depends on women's job options blogs.worldbank.org/en/impacteva...?

When is agricultural mechanization most effective for development? Guest post by Steven Brownstone

When is agricultural mechanization most effective for development? Guest post by Steven Brownstone

blogs.worldbank.org