Liam McHugh-Russell

@xntl.info

A volatile simian nervous system, ominously new to the planet. Canadian law professor. Transnational law, labour regulation, cooperatives and corporate governance, knowledge politics. Currently obsessed with the uses of legal scholarship. Two time dad.

E.g. with the original inclusion of trans women in women's spaces, that doesn't imply we should exclude trans men who are not sufficiently far along in transition and don't feel safe using men's spaces etc. We shouldn't be ruling based on legal essence. We need to rule based on humanity and dignity.

does anyone know of any work that’s been done on career trajectories of (UK humanities) academics who have been made redundant? eg information about how many go into school teaching, early retirement, independent research? appreciate this is complex, sensitive and much data is too recent

Our epistemic claims are trustworthy and reliable as a profession because we have standards. If we don't make those standards notorious, by enforcing them, the public will have no reason to know or understand why they should believe what we say.

Firefox tab organizer that operates through time rather than space. Like snoozing an email. I don't want to read that Wilson post about The Odyssey until I see it in two weeks. Is this a thing?

Westjet flight attendants are on strike, which is a good time to share my view that airlines (and many other federally regulated sectors) should be moved to a sectoral bargaining model. (1) What would that mean? And (2) why is it a good idea?

The actual status quo? Threat of strike, actual strike, flights cancelled & delayed, airports disrupted, back to work order, fight in court, wildcat strike. With three units per airline, three airlines, and three year agreements, you get the same song and dance *three times per year.*

Westjet flight attendants are on strike, which is a good time to share my view that airlines (and many other federally regulated sectors) should be moved to a sectoral bargaining model. (1) What would that mean? And (2) why is it a good idea?

I think being aware of social construction of entities is super important, especially in law. But when my students get excited I remind them that bridges are socially constructed too and that bridges are often easier to change

Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò@olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social · 5d ago

there are a lot of philosophical concepts that get egregiously misused out of the seminar room (and in the seminar room, to be fair). but in terms of sheer pernicious misuse "social construct" has gotta be top 5 somewhere and it's not number 5

I think being aware of social construction of entities is super important, especially in law. But when my students get excited I remind them that bridges are socially constructed too and that bridges are often easier to change

Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò@olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social · 5d ago

there are a lot of philosophical concepts that get egregiously misused out of the seminar room (and in the seminar room, to be fair). but in terms of sheer pernicious misuse "social construct" has gotta be top 5 somewhere and it's not number 5

there are a lot of philosophical concepts that get egregiously misused out of the seminar room (and in the seminar room, to be fair). but in terms of sheer pernicious misuse "social construct" has gotta be top 5 somewhere and it's not number 5

Scott Bryan@scottygb.bsky.social · last wk.

Channel 4 has announced documentary “The Great ADHD Myth?” It “seeks to determine whether ADHD is a genuine neurodevelopmental disorder, or a social construct.”

I was going to say that people who love The Bear have not adequately recognized the incredible job Ebon Moss-Bachrach does as Richie. But apparently he won two Emmys? So it's not like he's being slept on. Still, his ability to bring emotional subtlety to working class anxieties is breathtaking

One of the things that American liberals™ long got heat for us they talked or refused to actually engage on questions of strategy. And agree or disagree, that's just not an attack that lands with the Liberal Currents folks. They want equality, and they want to win

Adam Gurri@adamgurri.liberalcurrents.com · 6d ago

The Prairieland case is a perfect example of the "burn down a walmart" theory of change when you attempt to put it into action. Song says he intended it to be a warning shot, but you can't control what the bullet does after a warning shot. Don't fire at all. www.liberalcurrents.com/prairieland-...

On the evening of July 4, 2025, a collection of activists and protesters arrived at the Prairieland ICE detention facility in Alvarado, Texas. They performed a "noise protest," among other things setting off fireworks, in an attempt to signal to the detainees that they were not alone. Some individuals also slashed car tires and spray-painted "Ice Pig" and "Fuck you Pigs" on a car and a guard hut. ICE agents inside the facility called the local police, who responded. After an altercation, one protester—Benjamin Hanil Song—fired an AR-15 in the direction of a police officer. A bullet struck the officer in the neck, but did not kill him. Song and fifteen other activists were ultimately arrested, charged, and in June 2026 convicted by a jury of their peers of multiple charges, including material support of terrorism. Song was sentenced to 100 years in prison.

Much has been written about these events, whether about the morality of the activists' actions, the absurdity of referring to antifa as an "organization" let alone a terrorist one, or the strikingly long sentences handed down. The longest sentence handed down to any of the January 6 insurrectionists, for comparison, was 22 years.