Zeth Lietzau

@zethlietzau.com

Public librarian with technology & software leanings

To install a PWA on iOS, you have to: - Navigate to the site - Open the menu - Click "share" (wtf!?) - Click the SECOND "more" ellipsis icon (not the first!) - Click "add to home screen" - Click the "Add" button This is, to me, unacceptably byzantine. Just deliberately hostile on Apple's part.

Listen kids Your value as a knowledge producer is *not* that you can shit things out quickly It's not that you can whatever program to check a bajillion things and make a graph It is that folks can trust that you know what you're talking about and checked the tape You give that up, you're fucked

Dr. Holly Walters@manigarm.bsky.social · 3mo ago

I'm sorry, what? In writing my first monograph, I spent six weeks trying to track down a citation in TWO languages I didn't know. And good thing too, because the citation was wrong. That's scholarship. That's research. You know, the thing we're trained to do?!?

The reactions of some researchers on Twitter finally being held responsible for not having read the very paper they submitted are... something. Mainly, they don't think they should have to check every citation or make sure the data is real and accurate. Because it's too hard, I guess.

I’m sorry but “everyone is going to use AI to code their own apps” sounds like “everyone is going to learn HTML and code their own websites.“ like … have you met people? no they’re not

Every billionaire: “I literally don’t review my own thoughts or interrogate my ideas or premises” Median voter: “We should keep letting them spend infinite money on elected officials, if not run for office themselves”

Kaitlin Is Just Getting Started@gothamgirlblue.com · 5mo ago

Billionaires are literally posting on main that they are stupid people who don’t think and we’re still going to have millions of people insist that they run the government unfettered

The amount of duplication that is done by AI on a daily basis is really mind boggling. People not looking up things that already exist, code that's already been written, communities they could have interacted with. It's profoundly wasteful and antisocial. It's just really such a shame.

but look how many lines of code i can spit out whilst i sleep using the billionaire-owned suicide-inducing planet-killing war machine pls listen to yourself

Our product can show you what's outside the window that's right next to you, perform a Google search slower than you can yourself, and misinform your surgeon mid-procedure, causing a catastrophic failure that will injure you for life. The entire economy is propped up on it

This is an excellent analogy, because my recollection from grade school is that the pen on the right looks fun and exciting, and then you play with it for a few minutes and realize it's not actually useful for anything and in fact makes some tasks more cumbersome, and never think about it again.

@marykmac.bsky.social · 8mo ago

yeah, just out of interest, how many people choose the pen on the right for real work or art? See a lot of them in professional workplaces, do you?

Picture of two pens. The first is an ordinary ballpoint pen, with the caption “how work feels doing it alone”. The second is a picture of one of those novelty pens with ten colours that you had when you were thirteen, with the caption, “how work feels worh an AI employee”. At their bottom it says “hire an AI employee for $0.97/day”.

the leaders of the civil rights era could not propose or veto legislation. they had no "power." but they had legitimacy because they were out there. Letter from a Birmingham Jail was written...FROM JAIL. But with these guys "Hey it's crazy right now and we can't do much, but give us money." LOL ok.

I get that this sounds like something from sci-fi. You talk into a device and it gives you what you want. But I don't want Google digging through my photos or all my personal files just to tell me about tires. I would rather ask the people whose job is to know about tires.