Adam Squires

@adsquires.bsky.social

Biophysical Chemist. Aerosol scientist. Jew. Likes lipids, nano materials, x-ray / neutron scattering, pretentious coffee. (he/him/his). Twitter @adsquires

I will be advertising a funded PhD studentship shortly, for a project on adding psychological theory (social identity) to modelling of epidemics ( @leverhulme.ac.uk funded, with Marijn Stok). The studentship will start in January 2027. Get in touch now for informal enquiries.

As an alumni of both Jesus College, as someone who did modules with the Education faculty, and did my dissertation (R&I) on the experiences of people of colour at Cambridge - and saw through my research just how stark the racial disparities are at Cambridge - this entire saga has made me very sad

Pondering the difference in perspective re schools between people like me, and people like @lewisgoodall.com, arguing for a shift of balance towards school reopening; I think much comes down to the specifics of the maths, and for me, the significance of the tipping point above Vs below R=1 1/

Adam Squires@adsquires.bsky.social · 3d ago

So then it really is helpful to discuss the maths. R>1 just means cases go up and up exponentially (albeit more slowly). It's still effectively out of control - the total impacts of staying with R=1.1 are massive vs R=0.9.

Pondering the difference in perspective re schools between people like me, and people like @lewisgoodall.com, arguing for a shift of balance towards school reopening; I think much comes down to the specifics of the maths, and for me, the significance of the tipping point above Vs below R=1 1/

Adam Squires@adsquires.bsky.social · 3d ago

So then it really is helpful to discuss the maths. R>1 just means cases go up and up exponentially (albeit more slowly). It's still effectively out of control - the total impacts of staying with R=1.1 are massive vs R=0.9.

There has been some talk on here about us still being traumatised, as societies, by what happened during the height of the pandemic. That’s probably true, but we should also remember that in the west we were very lucky (again, as societies), even if there were very many personal tragedies. 🧵

Hadn't realised he'd become a loon, but is he arguing that there *hasn't* been an increase from <300 ppm pre industrial revolution to >400 ppm now? Or that there has but it isn't anthropogenic (in which case...?)

Lembit Öpik
@lembitopik
Will the Green Party explain how mankind’s minuscule net contribution to atmospheric CO2 (less than 1 atom per million per decade) can dramatically change climate? Of course not.  Because it’s total baloney

Dr. Fauci is a hero. He really is. He helped guide America thru a mass death event. Millions more could have died but they did not, thanks to him. Everyone over 70 owes him a debt. It is disgusting that we live in a country that not only dishonors him but actively smears his good name.

👇🏻there will be no return to normal *or* settling to a *new* normal. It keeps spiralling worse and worse until we get to net zero, and for a while after that. And the slower we do it, the worse it gets. (The first sentence:also known as positive feedback loops. Which are not usually the good sort)

Peter Allen@peterallen.bsky.social · 7d ago

To quote Mark Blyth, the climate crisis is ‘a giant non-linear outcome generator with wicked convexities. In plain English, there is no mean, there is no average, there is no return to normal. It’s one way traffic into the unknown’. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...