Alf Collins

@alfcollins.bsky.social

Doctor, patient advocate, Trustee Patients Association, Picker Institute. Person centred, high value care, shared decision making, support for self management. Ex Health Foundation, NHS England. Rugby, family, good food. Personal views

There is much to be welcomed about the Amos report - but its conclusions on the influence of ‘normal birth’ ideology on maternity safety are not supported by wider evidence, offer dangerous false assurance and must not be relied upon. www.hsj.co.uk/patient-safe...

The Amos review’s conclusions on ‘normal birth ideology’ are not credible

The Amos review's conclusions on maternity safety contradict four previous major investigations, raising serious questions about the evidence underpinning national policy

hsj.co.uk

We call it ‘deeming leadership’ In a close field it is the worst type of leadership. We deem compassion and candour and quality. We get poor care, burnout and privatisation. Cock up or conspiracy?

I’ve always thought of national policies as having the same status as the Egyptian Book of the Dead. Detailed priestly prescriptions for how to control something that doesn’t happen and, even if it does, can’t be controlled.

Wife about to undergo bilateral cataract surgery. Basic lenses available on NHS, more sophisticated lenses only available privately. Having looked at NICE and evidence, it does seem that the core argument is population value. But…seems like a good case for copayments. Tell me I’m wrong 😊

I don’t think we’ve got much chance of improving things like life expectancy and healthy life expectancy until we stop bickering about payment models and NHS funding and start focusing on the reasons we get sick in the first place.

With Penelope Keith’s passing, I got to thinking about Paul Eddington, in his final days, facing the camera that one last time, despite the shitty hand life had dealt him, and the courage it must have taken to do so. Given the chance to spin some grandstanding bullshit, he chose to say this instead:

“A journalist once asked me what I would like my epitaph to be and I said I think I would like it to be ‘he did very little harm’. And that’s not easy. Most people seem to me to do a great deal of harm. If I could be remembered as having done very little, that would suit me”.

Rant coming up. We know that shared decision making ensures that demand is informed, so it reduces ‘supplier capture of the market’ and unwarranted variation. It also leads to improvements in personal and population value. So could someone tell me who is leading on SDM in DHSC? No? Thought not…

I’ve been speaking with friends who applied for the DHSC Director of Patient Experience role and weren’t shortlisted. I’m getting the distinct impression that personalised care (esp. support for self management and shared decision making) are no longer priorities for Government. Shame on them.

Yes. Leads to bias, distorted priorities as managers chase metrics, staff demoralisation feeling their professional judgement undervalued, inequalities as patients with less targeted conditions wait longer and public confusion when media reports on waiting lists etc do not reflect lived experience.