Amal Chatterjee (migrant, grumbler)

@amalkc.eurosky.social

Writer. Fellow, Royal Historical Society. Coming Up: "Prisoners of Empire: How Former Colonies Were Set Up to Fail" (Hurst, 2026); also "AcrossTheLakes", "RepresentationsOfIndia,1740-1840" etc plays, Tutor, Creative Writing,Oxford Uni.; Migrant, grumbler.

Clearing out ready for the move, and came across this from my mum's old bits. 1965 and the same arguments on immigration we hear today. Just shows how pointless this round and round on "controlling immigration" narrative is.

Cover of the 1965 Forum for University of Bristol conservative association NOVEMBER

FORUM

Issue No. 3

Introduction

Chairman's Letter

What is Parliament For?

Enoch Powell

The Whys and Wherefores of Education

Keith Hampson

Overseas Industrial Investment

Paul Chambers

The Union Carthorse

Christopher Adams

The Soul of Man Under Socialism

Ryan Huxtable

Immigration Policies

David Renton

The Challenge of the Guerrilla

John O'Sullivan

The Need for Penal Reform

Nigel Samuelson

The Most Vital Reform of All

Paul R. Rayner

Letters

Christopher Adams - EDITOR

Production & Advertising

PAUL RAYNER

Published by

UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL CONSERVATIVE ASSOCIATION

3immigration policies

It has for several generations been widely accepted that some degree of immigration control is essential. Britain is one of the most densely populated and over-urbanised countries in the world and is certain to become more so through natural increase even if immigration were to cease.

Immigration controls are always rather difficult to administer, whichever method is used. As we live on an island our best method is a stringent control of entry at the ports coupled with power to deport those who evade the control, which is most often done by telling lies about the reasons for the visit.

Any system of control must provide for temporary visits to this country by students, business men, tourists (who are to us a valuable source of foreign exchange), athletes and others. This means that a time limit for their stay here must be stamped on their passports, and those who overstay their time can be deported.

Since 1914 we have had control of entry of aliens. Apart from a few well defined exceptions. the only aliens allowed to stay here longer than six months are those for whom the Ministry of Labour has given a permit to do a job for which no resident labour is available. Most labour permits have been issued to aliens working in the hotel and catering trade, as domestic workers in hospitals or private houses, or in the brickfields. After their permits have been renewed annually for four years, aliens become "condition free" and so long as they do not misbehave they may remain here indefinitely without any permit. After five years, if they are of good character, can speak and read English, and intend to remain, they may apply to become naturalised British subjects, The Aliens Control has worked smoothly and effectively in spite of its inherent difficulties.

Until 1st July, 1962, any British subject or Commonwealth citizen (in law the two phrases mean the same but to be within that general status a person must have the particular citizenshipof the United Kingdom and Colonies or of an independent country within the Commonwealth) was imposed a degree of control upon the settlement here of Commonwealth citizens it was not able to come and go from here at pleasure. The Commonwealth Immigrants Act. 1962, however, as were consistent with stemming the vast flow of Commonwealth immigrants which took place such a stringent control as that under the Aliens Order and its terms were as liberal and humane during the previous two years.

The net intakes of immigrants from all parts of the Commonwealth were: in 1960, 79,850; in 1961, 145,900; in 1962, 112,400; in 1963, 66,000; in 1964, 75,500; in the first six months of 1965, 49,097. Therefore, although the 1962 Act considerably reduced the net intake, it is still far too large for an annual increase of 60,000 a year adds tremendously to our demand for houses, schools, hospitals, and services, besides increasing the already heavy congestion in our cities and large towns. The argument that immigrants are needed for our economy overlooks the effort required to house, feed, and clothe them and their families, educate their children, and provide hospital and maternity services for them. Single men and women are possibly an economic asset but men with families are generally not so.

Whatever the economic or manpower argument may be, however, it is now at last accepted that is is overridden by the social implications that we cannot hope for a quickly improved stan-dard of living for our own people if demands for houses, schools and hospitals are greatly increased by unknown numbers of immigrants each year.

When in Opposition the Labour Government strenuously opposed the 1962 Act indeed they voted against it 48 times. But events, numbers and their responsibilities as Ministers of the Crown have obliged them to reverse their policy, and it is not surprising that they have now com-mitted themselves to intensifying the control under the Act. Employment vouchers are to be redu…

Utterly fatuous claims being made on other social media channels that the protests in The Hague were smothered by local football hooligans "defending" the city centre. "We don't tolerate our city being plundered, cultural heritage being destroyed or any other form of vandalism," they blustered.

Tien aanhoudingen in Den Haag, maar geen grote demonstraties in steden

In Den Haag wordt geprotesteerd. Er is veel politie, net als in Maastricht, maar daar is de sfeer gemoedelijk.

nos.nl

With way in which trans individuals are being directly persecuted, and I do not use that word lightly, as a matter of government policy what exactly is the point of Stonewall if they will not campaign to get the Supreme Court ruling, which has fuelled much of the removal of rights, overturned. 3/

Stonewall was not, Blake stressed, aiming to overturn the supreme court ruling. "We understand that this is the law. But we also want to ensure that trans people are protected and, along with other organisations, we are looking at what that would look like."

NHS England policy for trans people could have 'a number of adverse impacts', report finds

Discriminating against trans people on the grounds of gender reassignment remains illegal, he noted, and the supreme court judges argued their ruling should not be seen as one side in a bitter culture war triumphing over the other. "It's on government and our watchdogs and everybody with responsibility to understand the impact, and where there is a negative impact to take action."

Trans rights are being rolled back across the world. Under Labour we are witnessing the largest attack on trans, as well as human in general, rights for decades. The Supreme Court ruling has opened the door to trans individuals being excluded from public life. 1/ www.theguardian.com/society/2026...

‘Progress takes time’: Stonewall CEO on turning down the heat on the trans debate

Leader is charting a course through troubled waters as a new survey finds trans people feel more pessimistic about social acceptance after combative decade

theguardian.com

Immigration is not and never has been the cause of underfunding in schools, the high cost of living, public spending cuts etc. Yes the far right hijacks all these issues to scapegoat migrants, but immigration isn't why people are protesting the cost of living, the cost of living is.

England’s water companies failed on environment. Sewage dumped in rivers. 2666 pollution incidents in England in 2025, 40% more on 2016. Execs rewarded, none prosecuted. Customers fleeced. Even with nationalization, it will take a generation to recover.

Eight of England’s nine water companies still failing on environment, report finds

Angela Eagle tells industry ‘people are sick of excuses’ as pollution levels remain high despite billions in investment

theguardian.com

£1.25bn subsidy for Rolls-Royce to develop a new engine. RR will keep assets and income streams. RR had operating profit of £3.5bn in 2024-25, will pay £9bn to shareholders over next 3 years. Why are shareholders not funding new engine? UK Govt won't take equity stake, £1.25bn not repayable.

Hold your nose: a £1.25bn subsidy for rich Rolls-Royce’s new engine had to happen

The chancellor’s budget giveaway is, unfortunately, a reflection of how life works in the global aerospace business

theguardian.com

A few stories about people who will be impacted by the ILR changes. The changes will accomplish nothing except inflicting misery and suffering on people, which at this point I must assume is their only purpose.

Indefinite leave to remain changes are devastating - I worry I'll lose everything

Young people on track for permanent residency say the proposed ILR reform could leave them facing years of uncertainty, mounting costs and the prospect of uprooting from the UK

inews.co.uk

"The fact that you have all of these parties that are advocating major war crimes and nobody is blinking says something very deep about Israeli society, but also about an international community that has fostered this and that has allowed this to brew for all of these years."

Will Ousting Netanyahu Change Anything for Palestinians? Diana Buttu on Upcoming Israeli Elections

Israeli parliamentary elections are being held on Tuesday, the first since Hamas’s October 7, 2023, attack and Israel’s subsequent assault on Gaza. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is cu...

democracynow.org