Andrew West

@awest.uk

IT guy. Photographer. Works for that charity, you know the one.

The attention being paid to Tilly Norwood is like me turning up to your economics class and saying ‘you guys assume everyone is a rational actor and that’s just not true lol’

So many people with aviation psychosis claiming that the Wrights’ invention is going to reshape global geography when it can’t even go more than 25 yards

People are going to start losing their jobs to AI. We urgently need ways to deal with this, but the policy wonks still think it’s sci-fi and the academic commentators who they lean on are still telling everyone the tech is all hype, for some goddamn reason. It’s a bad situation!

Gonna briefly do an AI take: it used to be possible to have interesting discussions about AI here, and it's got progressively less so. You can't just think AI is bad, or overhyped, you've also got to subscribe to a very particular worst-case scenario about *how* it's bad and how bad it is.

Last August was dry, and I had to stay up late one night monitoring my parents’ neighbour burning his scrub in an impromptu bonfire. Nice line of trees between me and him. Little jolt of adrenaline every time a spark went their way. Some people are just not that bright and don’t watch the news.

Been testing this 'sign-language-to-text' (SL2T) for almost a year & it's so awesome to see this out! Looked at this almost a decade ago & knew we'd get the tech & ML models there eventually (but super challenging). Talking w/ some Deaf folks, an equivalent of 'voice-to-text' was huge for them

Putting sign language AI into users’ hands

Introducing sign-language-to-text (SL2T), our breakthrough model powering new sign language features for Deaf and hard of hearing users.

deepmind.google

I get that the sirens’ song is inherently not composable. But Christopher Nolan has infinite money and any artist in the world would take his phone call. Maybe try *something*. Hell, get AI to invent a musical psychology and compose something that induces a compulsion oh no wait

There's lots of stuff LLMs can't do, but if you want to disbelieve all the recent math, you have to believe a bunch of Fields Medalists with long track records are just straightforwardly lying about the thing they care most about. Here's a recent blog by Gowers: gowers.wordpress.com/2026/05/08/a...

A recent experience with ChatGPT 5.5 Pro

We are all having to keep revising upwards our assessments of the mathematical capabilities of large language models. I have just made a fairly large revision as a result of ChatGPT 5.5 Pro, to whi…

gowers.wordpress.com

Tucked away in this article is an appeal to the AI skeptics to PLEASE stop writing off stories like this OpenAI accidental exploit of Hugging Face as a dishonest marketing trick Frontier models can find and exploit vulnerabilities now, it helps nobody to pretend that they can't!

Resist the temptation to write this off as a stunt #

There will inevitably be some people who dismiss this story as a dishonest marketing trick by OpenAI to make their models sound terrifyingly effective. I found 81 instances of the term “marketing” in the Hacker News discussion of the incident.

To those people I say pull your heads out of the sand—you’re now including Hugging Face in your conspiracy theories, just so you can deny the crescendo of evidence here!

The best models we have today have the ability to both find and exploit new vulnerabilities. The ExploitGym paper itself concludes that “autonomous exploit development by frontier AI agents is no longer a hypothetical capability”, and this incident is a perfect example of exactly that.

Tech commentary often has to be ‘what if now, but forever’, and that doesn’t work well when change is so rapid. An easy flipside is discussing power dynamics rather than the tech itself, and that’s very effective at riling people up, but the world still turns.

Ethan Mollick@emollick.bsky.social · 2mo ago

I still believe that everyone is too fixated on the state of play in AI right now (which labs are ahead, how to manage costs, etc.) and not focused enough on the continued steepness of the capability curve for AI At higher capabilities (like the ones expected in the near term), a lot changes fast.

Since we can exercise discretion about breaking news alerts for overnight football matches, maybe fewer murder alerts at Christmas?

Quite fun watching the normie press discover ramageddon now that Apple has put its prices up. Thankfully there’s 6 months of deep dissection in tech podcasts that will help the coverage be sensible and informed.

It is weird that there is still a substantial set of people who believe "AI is mostly hype" at this stage: Five Eyes is warning about AI, exponential revenue & token use at the AI labs, unit distance/Erdos proofs, and so on... There are many real issues with AI, not being real is not one of them.

“I am appalled at the man blasting music over this very serious occasion. Anyway now back to gleefully reporting on successfully hounding another Prime Minister till they cried.”

NEW: malware developers added nuclear & biological weapons text to to their spyware. Goal? To trigger LLM safety refusals... so that their spyware wouldn't be analyzed by an AI security scanner. Cleanest practical example I can think of for why over-indexing on first order "safety" is risky. 1/

Bild