This brief for @beidelson.bsky.social & @hellmandeborah.bsky.social is excellent--it explains, better than Harvard's own brief does, why the vast majority of incidents alleged in the DOJ suit did not violate Title VI. [1]
The brief explains why these lawsuits are foreclosed by both Title VI and the First Amendment. It also highlights some striking distortions in the govt's version of events at Harvard—like blatantly misquoting an email, & apparently defining opposition to speech restrictions as "anti-Israeli". (2/2)