Ben Eidelson

@beidelson.bsky.social

Professor, Harvard Law School. Also developer of @CaseViewerApp.bsky.social https://faculty.law.harvard.edu/eidelson

You can now listen to nearly all opinions in Case Viewer, with a text-to-speech algorithm tuned for legal content (notice how it compresses the U.S. cite). And it will keep playing from the background or lock screen with navigable sections, like a podcast. (Watch video with sound on.) caseviewer.app

It's really that simple: the federal government want "Jewish" to be defined as holding specific policy attitudes

Title VI’s restriction to ancestry-based harassment also means that the Government’s allegations about the intensity of anti-Israel or “anti-Zionist” sentiment on campus are mostly beside
the point. E.g., AC ¶¶ 9, 19–21, 51, 54, 56, 68, 79, 97. Drawing on the same Harvard report, for
example, the Government stresses that many Jewish survey respondents “indicated they had experienced some form of discrimination, stereotyping, or negative bias on campus due to their views
on current events.” Id. ¶ 85 (emphasis added). Those experiences certainly matter for a university
that aims to foster respectful engagement amid profound disagreements. But under Stand With Us,
the Government must allege facts suggesting that the hostility felt by these students was not simply
“due to their views on current events”—even if those views were despised by many of their peers—
but rather owed to their Jewish or Israeli birth. Assuming arguendo that many Harvard students
reject the legitimacy of a specifically Jewish state in the historic Land of Israel—and that many of
those anti-Zionist students exhibited intolerance toward everyone who disagreed with them—those
hostile students still would not have engaged in discrimination covered by Title VI. See, e.g., Kestenbaum v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, 743 F. Supp. 3d 297, 311 (D. Mass. 2024)
(“[V]iewpoint discrimination . . . is not actionable under Title VI.”).
Ben Eidelson@beidelson.bsky.social · 3w ago

On Friday I submitted an amicus brief in the DOJ antisemitism case against Harvard, supporting the university (w/ @hellmandeborah.bsky.social). The main arguments also apply to other cases, like the 3rd Circuit appeal in Yakoby and the DOJ suit against UCLA. PDF: tinyurl.com/mr2rezk9 (1/2)

The Trump administration's new Title VI complaint against Harvard is pervasively disingenuous in its factual allegations and exceedingly weak on the law. Fortunately the district court & court of appeals will be guided by the MIT precedent, which makes this pretty open & shut.

I will be testifying at this panel also, along with @beidelson.bsky.social and Eugene Volokh. it should be interesting bc panelists are very far apart: Did the fed gov do too little to repress antisemitic student speech on campus after Oct 2023? or did it instead flagrantly violate 1A rights?

MMichael C. Dorf@dorfonlaw.bsky.social · 6mo ago

🧵Tomorrow at 10:15 am, I will be one of the panelists testifying for the U.S. Civil Rights Commission's briefing on Antisemitism on America's College and University Campuses: Current Conditions and the Federal Response. Here's an overall description. 👇

Isn't this message from the EEOC blatantly unconstitutional under Trump DOJ guidance? A nice exhibit for any university challenged over targeted recruitment or the like! "Are you a white male who has experienced discrimination at work based on your race or sex? You may have a claim..."

Bild

I am trying to keep most of the Case Viewer content on @CaseViewerApp.bsky.social, but I'm especially proud of this innovation and can't resist sharing it here too. The best way to read a judicial opinion, IMHO. (The magic is that none of the section titles below are actually in the opinion.)

Case Viewer@caseviewerapp.bsky.social · 8mo ago

Here's a quick video showcasing the new Table of Contents feature in Case Viewer version 1.2 — now available for Mac, iPad, and iPhone (www.caseviewer.app). It extracts the opinion's actual heading structure, uses an LLM to make descriptive section labels, and maps the argument structure too.

Case Viewer is one of those tools you didn't know you needed. Apple-only for now, but it brings a simple, clean interface to reading case law, and it's finally out of beta! We're proud to have our APIs and data integrated into the tool and we encourage folks to give it a try!

Case Viewer@caseviewerapp.bsky.social · 11mo ago

Some of Case Viewer's features are powered by the amazing data from @free.law (CourtListener). Two examples: 1. a D.C. Cir. case with embedded oral argument audio & info on all the participating judges. 2. An 8th Cir. slip opinion filed today and not yet available in almost any other database.

Case Viewer, my quirky side project of building my ideal legal search & reading app, has come a long way. With lots of help, it's grown into the best way to find & read cases on a Mac, iPhone, or iPad. Check it out or download on the App Store below. And follow @CaseViewerApp for updates!

Case Viewer

caseviewer.app

Case Viewer@caseviewerapp.bsky.social · 11mo ago

Case Viewer 1.0 is now on the App Store! After 2 years of refinement, Case Viewer is easily the fastest and most rewarding way to find and read cases. We're dropping the "beta" label and making the app widely available for macOS, iPhone, and iPad. Get it here: apps.apple.com/app/apple-st...

Case Viewer running on a MacBook, iPhone, and iPad