evan

@beingandslime.bsky.social

the bluey sky above me, the blual law within me

Really excited to announce that starting in the fall I'll be an assistant professor in the philosophy department at East Tennessee State University! So hit me up if you're ever in Appalachia!

it was an old american tale that a great ball, representative of time itself, dropped from the sky at the culmination of each year. (it is worth noting that while most sources refer unambiguously to a ball, we see occasional talk of a "square of time" as well)

another new paper!!! "The Ambiguous Inference: Sanches’ Refutation of the Self-Contradiction Objection to Global Skepticism" is forthcoming in Philosophical Quarterly! Thread below for details...

Bild

NEW PAPER ALERT: deleuze's epistemology of inquiry is now forthcoming in the southern journal of philosophy! read on for more info on what deleuze's epistemology (of inquiry) is! (link at bottom)

Bild

husband: i found some vital data today wife: oh honey not again husband, putting papers out on the table: gorilla city is real. the ancient Aztecs knew it wife: how would gorillas even build a city husband: look at this. Gorilla averages near Tlatelolco are off the charts

be on the lookout for my upcoming book "Gestures Towards a Prolegomenon of Future Prefatory Remarks: Some Fumblings in the Dark of a Humble Servant of God, Illuminated Only by the Grace of the Almighty, tho' Otherwise Ignorant, O! A Wretched Sinner Am I!"

Wow! A new paper! One of the main topics in scholarship on ancient skepticism is the "rustic vs. urbane" debate: whether skeptics were weirdo forest sages with no beliefs or normal guys with everyday beliefs. I think this debate is kind of silly and I show why in this paper!

Bild

teachers always complain about students having nothing to say after lectures but that doesn't make sense. if you've explained yourself well there should be no questions. a good lecturer should strive for a reaction of respectful silence. perhaps applause

In the preface to his lectures on Machiavelli, Strauss says that Machiavelli was evil. So straight away I know he doesn't think Machiavelli was evil. I know how this works.

incredible fact: in the second sentence of "a plea for excuses," his defense of ordinary language philosophy, j.l. austin uses the word "ramiculate," which does not have a definition in any dictionary