Benjamin Farley

@brfarley.bsky.social

International law, law of armed conflict, national security law and policy, constitutional and criminal law. https://footnotesflashpoints.substack.com/profile/posts

The US/Israel-Iran war has now reached: -Iran; -Israel; -Lebanon; -Iraq; -Kuwait; -Saudi; -Yemen; -Bahrain; -Oman; -UAE; -Qatar; -Jordan; -Azerbaijan*; -Ukraine**; -Egypt; and -a variety of neutrals whose vessels have been attacked by one side or the other.

The Wall Street Journal@wsj.com · 6d ago

An explosion at a port on Egypt’s Mediterranean coast was caused by a drone attack, Egyptian authorities said, the first targeting of the country during the current Iran war.

New from me on the Monroe Doctrine and constitutional war powers. Many thanks to @lawfaremedia.org for letting me walk readers through a century of war powers practice under the doctrine--practice that reveals + reinforces real constraints on presidential power. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-...

The Monroe Doctrine Was Never a Blank Check for Presidential War

Trump’s “Donroe Doctrine” in Latin America inverts a policy that, properly understood, abided by and reinforced constraints on unilateral presidential force.

lawfaremedia.org

Reading through this Post piece and I can’t help but see a lot of parallels to the rationales in the run up to counter-ISIS war but with less public justification. Though I think the ISIS war was justified, needed, the failure to clarify the logic was risky www.washingtonpost.com/national-sec...

Trump administration weighing military options in Mali, officials say

If approved, it would add an eighth nation to the list of countries where President Donald Trump has ordered strikes since the start of his second term.

washingtonpost.com

Notably acknowledges (a) that the snatch-and-grab of Maduro was a war (without Congressional authorization); and (b) that Iran “conflict” has been ongoing for four months—contrary to both WPR report claims and 47-year war talking point

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 2w ago

Trump offers sales pitch for his war: "Afghanistan War: 20 years, 2,000 DEAD. Iraq War: 9 years, 4,600 DEAD. Vietnam War: 19 years and 5 months, 58,220 DEAD. Korean War: 3 years and 1 month, 36,574 DEAD. Venezuela War: 1 day, 0 DEAD. Iran Military Conflict: 4 months, 18 DEAD."

cap of Trump TS post

Sadly, it's time to re-up this Q&A by @mikeschmitt.bsky.social, me & @rgoodlaw.bsky.social on targeting & the #Iran war. To be clear it is never lawful to: - target civilians or civilian infrastructure as such - target "dual use" infrastructure to "send a message," punish, or coerce the other side

Expert Q&A: A Targeting Primer on the Iran War

Leading legal experts Q&A analyzes how the law of armed conflict applies to United States, Israeli, Iranian strikes - focusing on targeting rules and civilian protections.

justsecurity.org

Preventing some Iranian villagers from getting drinking water does nothing to prevent the IRGC from firing missiles and drones. Water is a red line. I know those of you who hate the US military and US foreign policy won’t care about the difference, but it’s significant, with very bad implications.

Mark Chadbourn@chadbourn.bsky.social · 3w ago

More war crimes: In its fourth strike on water infrastructure, the US has destroyed two water tanks in Sirik, Iran, completely cutting off water distribution in all villages of the Bemani district and the city of Kohstak, the Hormozgan Water and Sanitation Authority says.

The intel assessments partially declassified and released by President Trump related to election security strike me as largely an argument for (a) better privacy protections for Americans vis-a-vis commercial actors; and (b) improved cyber security requirements for state, local, and private actors.