Carlos Odio

@carlosodio.bsky.social

Co-founder, Equis Research. Miamian living in New Jersey. Not a pollster I just poll a lot.

A total rout in the Miami mayoral, in a race that had been highly nationalized (Trump endorsed the loser). The Dem (Higgins) over-performed 2024 presidential in predominantly Cuban (+8), non-Cuban Hispanic (+9), Black (+9), and White (+11) precincts-- over-performance across the board.

Bild

In NJ-09, one of the state’s most-watched CDs, Sherrill way over-performed 2024 support in the densest Hispanic precincts. Given recent past, it is reasonable to expect that 2025, not 2024, is the proper benchmark for 2026. That’s a big boost for incumbent Nellie Pou.

Bild

Here’s Passaic County now, preliminarily. Sherrill support closely tracks Murphy ‘21 in Hispanic precincts, way outperforming Harris there. Turnout is lower in Hispanic areas, per usual for Passaic, but less notable in 2025 than in 2021.

BildBild

Update: safe to say that Trump discontent isn't a polling mirage. Partial end-of-night #s have Sherrill coming in at around '21 levels in key Hispanic cities in NJ: in aggregate, higher than '20/'24, but lower than '16/'17. The tape is rewound a bit heading into '26.

BildBild
Carlos Odio@carlosodio.bsky.social · 11mo ago

NJ election is the first real measure of Latino support since last year. A test of whether the Trump discontent in polls is re-shaping behavior heading into '26: will Sherrill come in closer to '21 or '24 in Hispanic bellwethers? Here are cities to watch. Note '24 vs. prior.

NJ election is the first real measure of Latino support since last year. A test of whether the Trump discontent in polls is re-shaping behavior heading into '26: will Sherrill come in closer to '21 or '24 in Hispanic bellwethers? Here are cities to watch. Note '24 vs. prior.

BildBild

Tip of the day for avoiding Trump’s traps Don’t knock him for doing things differently, knock him for doing them poorly. Distinguish between shaking things up and fucking things up.

Found this one very compelling: “universalism” (cosmopolitan) vs. “particularism” (traditionalist) as an update to post-materialism, explaining trends across class, education & urbanicity. (They point to the rise of knowledge economies.) Also assign prominent role to candidates & group identities.

Cambridge University Press Political Science & IR@cambup-polsci.cambridge.org · 2y ago

New Cambridge Element 'Cleavage Formation in the 21st Century' by Simon Bornschier, @lhaffert.bsky.social, @siljahausermann.bsky.social, Marco Steenberge & @dpzollinger.bsky.social out now! Read #OpenAccess here: cup.org/3ZLtQ0o #cambridgeelements #politics

Cover image of Cleavage Formation in the 21st Century' by Bornschier et al

The piece is well-written. The problem is that in dismantling a one-dimensional approach (Latinos only care about immig), it threatens to replace it w/ another (“” are no diff on immig). Can’t understand Latino vote past or present w/o unpacking the unique cross-pressures created by this issue.

John Burn-Murdoch@jburnmurdoch.ft.com · 2y ago

Great piece from Rogé Karma on how Dems misread Latino opinion on immigration, and ended up shifting far to the left of where most voters were www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archiv... The theory shows up clear as day in the data 👇

Rule #1 for side-stepping Trump’s favorite traps: Don’t let him draw you into defending the wrong things. No need to defend: red tape, fentanyl smugglers, the military industrial complex, the status quo generally Do defend: consumers, workers, families, real people generally

This one breaks my heart. There is wishful thinking here. But also rational calculation based on past experience (see: enforcement of DeSantis immigration law). And there’s what came to be understood on campaign trail (Vance: “we start with the criminal migrants”), w/o pushback from Harris campaign.

Bild

Update: cast vote records (CVR) in Washoe (NV) allow us to see the choices voters made on the whole ballot. Overall, 5.8% of Trump voters went for Rosen, 5.5% went "none of the above" or 3rd party, and 1% skipped. (And there was more splitting in Latino precincts...)

Bild
Carlos Odio@carlosodio.bsky.social · 2y ago

Early look at cast vote records (CVR) in Washoe (NV), which allow us to see the choices voters made on the whole ballot: overall, 6% of Trump voters went for Rosen, to 4% who skipped the race. The chart shows Trump voters in Latino precincts were the most likely to either ticket-split or roll-off.

Early look at cast vote records (CVR) in Washoe (NV), which allow us to see the choices voters made on the whole ballot: overall, 6% of Trump voters went for Rosen, to 4% who skipped the race. The chart shows Trump voters in Latino precincts were the most likely to either ticket-split or roll-off.

Bild

Clark County, NV...at long last Harris under-performed Biden across the board but most, seemingly, in densely Hispanic precincts. A large drop two prez cycles in a row. Rosen (like Gallego in AZ) came short of Biden '20 levels but out-performed Harris — most in the heaviest Latino areas.

BildBild

Careful in drawing statewide conclusions from our precinct analysis. For starters, Latinos don't all live in densely Hispanic areas. Only 22% of Latino voters in Maricopa live in majority-Hispanic precincts. In Lehigh (PA), it's 33%. They tell a story, but it's only ever part of the story.

Bild