Colleen

@cbailey6.bsky.social

Scientist, cyclist, knitter. But only 2 out of 3 at any one time. 🔰 📌 Toronto

Your choices: 1. Support infill development in your city because you care about other people being housed 2. Support infill development in your city because you can have access to better services (including fewer potholes if that’s your thing) without having to pay more in taxes yourself 3. Both 1&2

I get that some of Eglinton has bike lanes now (although I found it very confusing what was sidewalk vs multi-use path in places and eventually gave up and went the long way home through Sunnybrook), but Don Mills does not and putting this decal here just feels like a huge insult.

Pink City of Toronto decal on the sidewalk telling people "Don't ride on the sidewalk" at the intersection of Eglinton and Don Mills. Don Mills is 8 lanes wide at this point.

Fortunate to get to choose between checking out the new part of Biidaasige Park and the new part of the Don Valley East trail. Chose the latter and made a detour to see Bear-braham Lincoln up close. She's beautiful.

Sometimes I reflect on the fact that the largest zoning change Toronto has seen in decades, in terms of the land area being upzoned, was done at a time when we didn't have a mayor. I like many things about Chow, but her tendency to compromise on housing policy instead of lead is not my favourite.

Damien Moule@damienmoule.bsky.social · last wk.

In May 2023, City Council allowed multiplexes with 4 units and 3 stories on all residential land. This was expanded with a 6 unit study in Ward 23 in February 2025. 6 units was planned to be rolled out to the rest of the city in June 2025 but was limited by Council to the old city and ward 23. 2/

If I were a provincial government, I would be embarrassed to leak to the press that I was planning to hold high speed rail hostage to get an airport. Maybe consider spending some time doing any work at all to convince voters instead of expropriating land and demanding to get your way?

Another Liberal MP said the province had made a “ham-fisted” effort to push the project through without a business case that was hard to justify.  “Even business Liberals were skittish.”
Toronto Star@thestar.com · last wk.

Premier Doug Ford told Prime Minister Mark Carney how “disappointed” he was that Ottawa is abandoning the Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport expansion to allow commuter jets, the Star has learned.

Played Jet Lag's Hide & Seek game across Toronto yesterday (very fun) and one of my friends figured out where we were from this photo of a bus stop. Some people are too online but I worry that some of you are too "on transit".

Bild

A few people in Dan's replies at the other place seem to think that demanding a business case for ALTO is some sort of gotcha instead of a normal part of the process for any large project. Truly cooked.

Partially visible quotedweet from @chrischapin:
If 75,000 people out of 40 million Canadians can shut down a national infrastructure project, we're doomed. We both know there's not a thing Doug could have done to change the views of these NIMBY losers. To be fair, the Feds were probably always going to cave, but if the...

Tweet from @anotherglassbox that quotes the above:
I'd be keen to see it too. And why its costs/timelines are coming in where they are.ote tweets the above
What was the national infrastructure project specifically? Like, not just “muh airport” but the business case, the specifics of how it interfaces with the economy of Toronto’s waterfront, etc.?

Bc my read is it took 75,000 to demonstrate the emperor had no clothes on this file.

Reply from @anonymouscanuk:
Show me the business case on Alto as well please.

Reply from @anotherglassbox:
I’d be keen to see it too. And why its costs/timelines are coming in where they are.

Same quote tweet as before, with a different reply:
Sorry are you talking about high speed rail? I support it, but your comment just fit too well with Alto as well.

Toronto took down all these signs to install this new gate, but made sure that the first one that they put back up was the no bicycles sign. Important because this path is still listed as a "multi-use trail" on their cycling map, despite years of people pointing out that bikes aren't allowed.

Bild
Colleen @cbailey6.bsky.social · last yr.

What the map should actually look like, by my accounting. (Red are just suggested roads where you can bike. There are no bike lanes).

New park opened in my Yonge-Eg neighbourhood. Like the parkette 1 block North, full of parents & kids. This is a real mystery because I'm informed by the expert commenters at every development meeting that children can't live in apartments and that we only build shoeboxes, not homes for families.

Peak City of Toronto self-sabotage. The city is trying to turn a partially collapsed warehouse at 53 Strachan into supportive/affordable housing. In March, it put the site on the heritage register, which then had to be modified. It is also delaying the affordable housing over concerns about height.

Letting very large numbers of students study at Canada’s best and highest demand universities is an unambiguous win for equality and productivity Now if only we could somehow apply this lesson to letting more people live and work in the most productive and highest demand cities

Alon (they/them)@alonlevy.bsky.social · 2w ago

TIL 4.3% of university-age people in Canada are University of Toronto students. Relative to just Ontario, it's 11%. In the US, all Ivies+, near-Ivies like NYU, Public Ivies, and elite LACs combined are around 3% of the cohort depending on which flagships are included. In the UK, Oxbridge are 1%.