Centre for the Critique of Law and Society (CCLAS)

@cclas2025.bsky.social

Building a community of critical legal thinkers, taking seriously the connections between knowledge and praxis. Queen Mary, University of London. Partnered with the Institute of Law, Birzeit University (Formerly CLSGC)

Now calling for papers for this year's Australian Progressive Legal Studies conference, held 3-4 December 2026 at RMIT. Come think with us on 'Making and Breaking Worlds: Old and New Struggles in Law and Political Economy'. Abstracts due 7 August!

BildBild

Andy Burnham has argued for public control of water and energy, but what kind of public ownership can meet the challenges of environment and climate breakdown? In a blog for the @ukcla.bsky.social, I explore a case study of Labour's post-war nationalisation of electricity. [1/3]

UK Constitutional Law Association@ukcla.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Andrew Woodhouse: Power Failure – Electricity Nationalisation and The Erosion of the Public Corporation’s “Three Freedoms” (1947-1967) ukconstitutionallaw.org/2026/06/18/a...

While the writing/editing are not always conducive to get the point across as clearly as it could, I think this is a very important contribution by Tanzil Chowdhury, as it identifies from within a historical materialist approach the 'blind spot' in political constitutionalist accounts on the left

Centre for the Critique of Law and Society (CCLAS)@cclas2025.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Tanzil Chowdhury on 'Left and Right strategies of Legislative Supremacy in Great Britain' criticallegalthinking.com/2026/05/29/l...

Today, @bentarnoff.com and @quinnslobodian.com consider whether "Muskism" could serve as a possible successor to post-Fordism. How should we understand Muskism's distinctive regime of accumulation, and what kind of social contract does it propose to stabilize its disruptive effects?

Muskism as Fordism

Coined by a German economist in 1926, Fordism came to describe the dominant political-economic order of the mid-twentieth century. Could "Muskism" play a similar role in the twenty-first?

lpeproject.org

I've written a short piece on international law, fetishism, and ideology - now out on Legal Form. I suggest that international law is an ideological fetishism of international relations.

Legal Form@legalform.bsky.social · 9mo ago

In our latest post @mariethogersen.bsky.social meticulously unpacks what *exactly* is ideological about international law. Against those who locate this merely in international law's content, she directs us to international law's fetishistic character. legalform.blog/2025/11/17/i...