Christophe Christiaens

@chchristiaens.bsky.social

Twitter exile. Brompton evangelist and speciality coffee drinker. Day job in Public Affairs. Alumnus @collegeofeurope. Posts in English and Dutch. My views only; RT≠endorse

NEW ANALYSIS: One of the most consequential discoveries of the 20th century is marked by a small blue plaque near my office. The lithium-ion cathode, Oxford, 1980. Grid batteries have since gone from one 5 MW project to 267 GW worldwide. New Bright Spots 👇 open.substack.com/pub/janrosen...

Batteries are quietly rewiring the grid

From a plaque in Oxford to a third of California's electricity peak: how batteries revolutionise the grid.

open.substack.com

In 2011, WeChat destroyed my presumption that China could not innovate (in tech, design, business model), and you can't visit China today without noticing innovations large and small. A decade and a half of easily-observable innovation, but much of the American punditry has not caught on yet.

Graham Webster@gwbstr.com · 3w ago

My most important 2¢: ”The Chinese models are not excellent only because of distillation,” said Mr. Webster of Stanford. “There is real innovation going on.” I keep hearing people of a certain ideological bent saying everything China builds in AI is effectively stolen. Not a wise assumption. 2/2

Glad to share some thoughts in this important NYT piece. For various uses and risks, adversarial and otherwise, open Chinese models are functionally at par with US leaders. Only in narrow areas does a perceived current “US lead” now matter. 1/ www.nytimes.com/2026/07/17/b...

China’s Moonshot AI Unveils Kimi Model, Threatening America’s Lead

China’s Moonshot AI unveiled a freely available artificial intelligence model that seemed to narrow the gap with cutting-edge offerings from U.S. tech companies.

nytimes.com