Ciggy Smoke Bringer aka Riotous Blottoness

@ciggysmokebringer.bsky.social

Mr. Rogers Anarchist, Level III Hermes, Andiamo Spirit

Support trans workers at the University of Washington Google form to express interest: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F... 2023 Equity Survey Report: 75% of transgender people surveyed reported experiencing harassment at University of Washington. uw-s3-cdn.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/u...

Support Trans Workers!

Postdocs and research staff at the University of Washington are bargaining for a new contract this summer. To address the worsening conditions for transgender people across the country, we proposed a memorandum of understanding to:

    Improve data privacy for anyone (regardless of identity) changing their name, and to wave their ID card replacement fee
    Provide sensitivity training for supervisors of trans workers, to prevent harassment. The equity survey jointly administered by UW and UAW 4121 shows that transgender people at UW are harassed 3x more than cisgender people [1].
    Secure a fund to support costs of gender transition.

Admin has rejected our proposal twice now, each time citing concerns we’ve already addressed. When pressed to explain his reservations, admin’s lead negotiator said: “I am not speaking in terms of facts.” “I haven’t been advised or done any research.” How are we supposed to work with that? 

University of Washington admin pride themselves on being part of a trans friendly institution. At the ceremonial pride flag raising, they honored the recently murdered trans girl and UW student Juniper Blessing with a new scholarship [2]. But when asked to simply waive the costs of replacing an ID card for anyone, cis or trans, who changes their name, they moan that we’re asking for “special treatment” and fear-monger about the federal government. How do admin really feel about the queer community? Seattle is a sanctuary city for many trans people fleeing violence from across the country. What precedent does it set if the largest employer in the city refuses to bargain over basic protections? Admin’s response to the transition support MOU we proposed must be seen alongside their other bargaining positions. So far, admin have proposed to:

    Slash anti-discrimination protections (for example, by removing “medical condition” from the list of protected categories), citing fear of the federal administration.
    Set Postdoc and Research Staff wages to barely increase, representing an effective $7500 wage cut (accounting for inflation) over 3 years. Admin agreed their own offer “fucking sucks”, and its less than half what they gave to non-union staff.
    Effectively take away our right to information about their bargaining proposals, so they never have to prove a thing they assert at the bargaining table.

It’s clear that admin will not give us a fair deal until we show them we won’t take anything less. We’re calling on our community allies – students, faculty and staff, fellow unions, community organizations – to pressure UW admin to start getting serious about our contract, and to support trans workers!

If you’d like to help out, you can sign up here and we’ll reach out to you. We also encourage you to share your opinions directly to UW admin by emailing the vice president of Human Resources Heather Horn at hhorn1@uw.edu.
Puget Sound Labor News Tracker@pnwlabortracker.bsky.social · 7h ago

Postdocs and research staff at the Unversity of Washington, organized through @uaw4121.bsky.social, are asking community members to write to the UW VP of HR to demand that UW not slash anti-discrimination protections. See more here: uaw4121.org/trans-equity/

and the same goes for "you should be grateful!" in the face of discontent. there's a reason why no politicians say it. I get that posters' have dreams, but the notion that someone could, Coriolanus-like, tell the polis how to feel and what to expect, it's super silly.

Snowden St.@snowden.st · 3w ago

I cannot think of a single time in history where public irritation about XYZ was successfully deflected by telling the angry people “well actually you should really be angry about ABC instead”

I have got to believe that this is actually symptomatic of a consensus drawing problem, and per some convos around 'consumer choice', Cuomo didn't seemed like an affirmed choice of positive belief, but one of familiarity and... lazy ass goalong in ignorance unless and until sock knocker knocked.

maria_from_ga@mariafromga.bsky.social · 6h ago

The voters were repeatedly backing Cuomo in the polls, like we can say the anti-Cuomo faction was longer than the pro-Cuomo but that was true for any candidate in a multi-candidate race and as the article I posted said, the establishment did pull for them They explicitly drafted Adams bc of Cuomo

“To unmask anonymous online critics, DHS has sent hundreds of subpoenas to social-media companies, according to people familiar with the matter. Its agents have tracked down Americans at work and on the road, asking them to sign letters acknowledging their online speech about ICE “may” be a crime.”

Civil Liberties Defense Center@cldc03.bsky.social · 6h ago

Great article in Wall Street Journal about how ICE is weaponizing social media platforms and what CLDC is doing to stop it! www.wsj.com/politics/pol...

If theres any lesson in this for Electoral Leftists, its the vessel and moment dont backfill ideological interest or loyalty, to the org the pol. The pol wining is a symptom of prior loyalty and interest working its tail off to win, and whether it sticks is entirely an efficacy audit

Ciggy Smoke Bringer aka Riotous Blottoness@ciggysmokebringer.bsky.social · 7h ago

Well yeah, everything after term makes that concrete as hell. Its always been the Kshama Show to her with accidental and timeplace benefits.

My son was wearing a "Vote Reform" t-shirt and an "I love Nigel" baseball hat. He's been spat at, abused, slapped around the head and told he's a brainless twat. God knows what's going to happen to him once he gets out of the house...